RateBeer
Clipper City McHenry Old Baltimore Style Beer 2.59 101

Clipper City McHenry Old Baltimore Style Beer

Percentile
17
overall

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
1012.58/5.02.59/5.04.5%48.7Lager glass
Commercial Description:
Modeled after the style of beer produced in Baltimore just after Prohibition. The beer is pale in color, is made with 100% malt, and has a very mild Hersbrucker hop character. A great example of the kind of beer our grandfathers consumed.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 DarkElf (2681), La Jolla, California, USA
1.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/101/56/20
Oct 6, 2005  
(12 oz bottle: Obtained in trade with jasonp, thanks Jason!) Oh boy, this pale lager is a pretty bad beer. It’s pale golden in color and crystal clear, which allows me to see the occasional carbonation bubble rising through the beer. The whitish head pours to a finger’s width and quickly settles to a thin, filmy layer. It basically smells and tastes like a cheap lager, mostly just grainy with a bit of lightly sweet corn and a slight bitterness. Light bodied with an awful aftertaste. Hopefully this "Old Baltimore Style Beer" never makes a big resurgence.


 BuckNaked (1211), Tempe, Arizona, USA
1.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/58/20
Sep 19, 2005  
Bottle: Pours to a totally clear golden yellow with some light orange highlights and a small , quickly disappating white head. The aroma is moist grains, sweat, a hint of pepper, and barely detectable hops. The taste is slightly sweet grains without much richness to them, a very light floral/grass hops, and peppery yeast. Light bodied, watery, but not overcarbonated! This is not an American Dark Lager.


 jde123 (715), Washington, Washington DC, USA
2.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/103/55/102/510/20
Aug 27, 2005  
Wow, not very good, definately one of the least flavorful beers I have ever consumed. However, I was having it with a bar burger flavored with caraway seeds, and it seemed to go pretty well with the rye flavor. But it is a lager, so it would go well with any flavorful food. At any rate, not the greatest dark lager, but a nice representation of an older style of beer that was brewed with more frequency many years ago.


 mephisto (1144), Taiwan
1.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/103/53/101/56/20
Aug 3, 2005  
em, i know that i am biased against lager, so i won’t trash it too hard. not the worst lager, but difficult to enjoy.


 jefcon (1009), Arlington, Virginia, USA
2.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/56/102/512/20
Jun 10, 2005  
Pale straw. My first impression: A little bit watery and uncomplex. Tastes slightly sweet, but there are also some good grain, rye, and malt flavors mingling here. I agree with the tasters who found the carbonation a bit artificial, reminiscent of club soda. Overall, a little rough around the edges, acceptable for a throwback beer.


 kujo9 (1079), North Ridgeville, Ohio, USA
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/105/56/105/512/20
Mar 28, 2005  
12 oz bottle(best before 6/05: Deep gold w/a lasting white head. DMS/corn w/ a medium spicy/floral noble hop aroma. Also a hint of metallic along with the lightly grainy malt aroma. Well balanced w/a grainy malt flavor up front that lasts into the finish. Some baked corn in the finish, which is semi dry and lightly pleasantly bitter; Corn flavor lasts into the aftertaste. Clean otherwise, no fruitiness. Lighter body, higher carb., and slightly dry m/f. I wasn’t sure how this was classified since I’m copying handwritten notes, but I guessed it was a corn Bo. Pils from the bitterness or a Pre Prohibition Pils due to all the corn characteristic. I see now that it’s a PPP, and not a bad one!


antibeersnob (29), Maryland, USA
2.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/56/103/513/20
Mar 23, 2005  
There was a quick skunk smell as soon as I opened the bottle. Freshness date was 4/1/05. Could have been a bad batch. Very light in taste, but not bad, just not great. Enough effervescence to make it interesting. This is the lightest "Dark Lager" I’ve ever seen as it was a bit darker that Coors Light.


DogfishKing (22), USA
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/58/104/515/20
Mar 22, 2005  
Not bad at all.... thought it would be a bit higher than the ratings. Mild in flavor and easy to drink but still good.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC