Gusler (2655), Tucson, Arizona, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 | Feb 8, 2004 The beer after departing the bottle is a transparent deep amber color with the head monstrous in size, semi-creamy in texture and the color a very light tan, lace is a thick patchy sheet upon the glass. Nose is all malt, lightly sweet and fresh, crisp, start is sweet, nicely malted, the top skeletal in feel to the palate. Finish is stern in its acidity, the hops pleasant and mild, the aftertaste quite dry, not as bad as I feared, not something I’ll ever drink again, but for those into “Light”, a decent beer. jazz88 (2237), San Francisco, California, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jan 3, 2004 Bottle. A light yellow bordering on clear color with a big foamy white head. A dusty aroma with a light crisp (at least when it is cold) flavor. As it warms it faids into a cardboard musty flavor that shoud be left to those on a diet. Sickboy282 (1100), San Diego, California, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Dec 15, 2003 A horrible beer not reccommended even for the lo-carb lovers out there. If you want lo carb, go for the pale ale.
|