 TipsyMcStager (928), Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 14, 2003 A classic drain pour. Offensive odour. Pours golden yellow, zero head, flat. High in alcohol content, hopefully to get wasted before noticing the taste.
presario (2982), Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Aug 14, 2003 3rd in a less than stellar after work series. Poor dishwater-like head. Gold colour. Faint but possibly cidery aroma. Cold or not this is an offensive drain pour. One sip is more than enough. What kind of rude chemical concoction is this? If you want it the rest of the can is sitting on my desk.
jeffc666 (1892), Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Aug 6, 2003 Best served in an ice cold fluted 40oz bottle. Since any hint of warmth will allow your taste buds to actually taste what you are drinking the entire beer MUST be consumed in a ratio that is inversely proportional to the heat of the drinking establishment.
Oakes (8093), gone rambling, Vietnam
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Aug 5, 2003 We’re heading up to the cottage for the August long weekend and my girlfriend decides she’s going to drink animal beer that weekend. So she buys some Kingfisher, Dogfish Head, the turtle Rescousse, Giraf Strong, Black Sheep Ale, Mongoose, Schlitz Red Bull, and Colt 45. I double checked my database and realized that I’ve never had any Colt 45. Since I was going to help her out with some of the strong stuff anyway, I decided to write notes. Light bronze colour. The aroma is slightly cidery, vaguely malty, with some higher alcohols. Drinkable – with touches of malt alongside the expected raunch of cider and fusels. Sweet, with a hot finish. Like most malt liquors, is utterly unpalatable after the first half, when it loses the palate-deadening ice cold sensation.
enormousstormis (11), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 4/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 4, 2003 Terrible. I think it's just terrible when the amount of money i have limits my beer choices to this awful thing. In other words, "it gets you f***ed up for less".
jerc (3936), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Aug 2, 2003 This was a birthday "present". Joy... Its cheap... it's not even that strong and any flavour that's in it is not pleasant.
Falconseye8 (525), Cartersville, Georgia, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Jul 29, 2003 I don't know what Billy Dee Williams sees in this beer other than an endorsement check. Not a malt liquor fan. Probably never will be.
bjbrown24 (61), Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 |
Jul 21, 2003 I don't know how this company is still in business because this beer is horrible. Eat a can of aspirin before you have a drink because this stuff sucks.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)