 KAggie97 (2474), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jun 21, 2004 Not as good as the stout or the Sparkling Ale, but still an enjoyable drink.
Drew (2410), Kent, Ohio, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Jun 18, 2004 A very light looking and tasting pale ale. Malts are thin and sweet; right down the middle of the tongue; surrounded by a mixture of carbonation and light hops. Body was too thin and the sweetness began to taste like artificial sweetner. I like the Sparkling Ale better.
Aarleks (404), Sydney, Australia
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Jun 6, 2004 Bottle: I used to love this when I was 18. Pours a light orange/copper with no real head and softdrink-like bubbles. Aroma of POR hops and slgiht biscuit notes. Flavour thin, watery and dissapointing. Some malt and hop flavours with a slight crystal background. Very dissapointed.
jerohen (1615), Bussum, Netherlands
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jun 4, 2004 Bottled, BB 14-04-05. Cloudy orange coloured, lots of small yeast particles. Weak aroma, some malts perhaps. Sweet and watery flavour, some malts. Watery and unimpressive.
harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jun 2, 2004 I had been wanting to try this one for a really long time, and it was good but not upto par, and I was kind of disappointed. Not as hoppy as I was looking for, but has a nice malt backbone, balanced acidity and relatively easy to drink. Very clean and crisp in the finish.
Suttree (2739), Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 |
May 29, 2004 Poured with yeast. Cloudy brownish yellow, lots of floaties. No aroma to speak of. Floral hops, slightly sweet. Crisp hop finish. Nice, easy drinkin’ Summer beer.
shadey (1500), Rochester, New York, USA
| 4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
May 21, 2004 I am truely amazed this beer is rated so poorly. I thought it was great and I typically don’t enjoy pales. This had a great fruit aroma and flavor. A sweet aftertaste made it a great desert. Maybe I enjoyed it more because I didn’t know its reputation. Give it another shot with an open mind.
fiulijn (7420), Como; Lausanne (CH); Malmö (SWE), Italy
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
May 21, 2004 Hazy pale color. Very light, boring, poor beer (I would say… lager), with a light eucalyptus touch.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)