 mullet (801), Melbourne, Australia
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
May 29, 2004 Very thick moussy, meringue head which seems to good to be true (ie. artificial). Slightly yeasty aroma but otherwise not much to report. Quite sugar-sweet with some caramel and a kind of sherbet character. Blah.
theread (51), Wagga Wagga, Australia
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Mar 12, 2004 Something Coopers should leave well alone, but having said that, it is way better than the other local West End and better than VB.
Sweet and a funny taste to begin with with a bit of bitterness and odd taste after. OK. Cheers all
eczematic (1198), Sydney, Australia
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Feb 5, 2004 surprisingly malty, but still thin. sweet in a stale cardboardy way, watery, with a bit of POR bitterness that jumps out and then recedes into flabby cheese-pawpaw finish. a slightly less chemically version of tooheys red.
bluevegie (2215), Perth, Australia
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jan 1, 2004 Drinkable but that is as far as it goes. Dusty grainy malty sort of taste.Thin body and leaves you wanting less.
Betty (234), Walgett, NSW, Australia
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Nov 26, 2003 Yeah, they were calling this regency draft at the National Festival o beers. Anyway, it seems like coopers is trying to muscle in on cascade pale. Nice one buttheads.
motelpogo (4395), Plzen, Czech Republic
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Nov 11, 2003 nfob03. i'm assuming this is the new coopers draught that is also known as regency draught. medicinal aroma. average as far as bad lagers go but what's that got to do with coopers?
Sully (1367), Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Nov 11, 2003 The nondescript blurb is backed up by the beer. With words that refer to chill filtered beer and the reference to draught beer means that you are looking at a fair dinkum dud. The nose is musty and there is no body of note at all. I hate it when you burp DURING the drinking of a beer and then feel the afterburn in the dry back palate. If you drank it out of a dimpled mug as suggested, you would be the same thing, perhaps without the dimple.
OlJuntan64 (1267), Perth, Australia
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Sep 30, 2003 Very faintly hazy pale gold with medium size shortlish lasting creamy yellow head. Faint eggshells, soap, asprin and stale bitter aroma. Thin dry body. Medium intensity short stale bitter start fades to shades of faint soft watery malt back to harshish bitter finish and after taste. Few redeeming features. I find it hard to rate - Hmmm is the "Adhesive tape, melted rubber and faint floral sweet hops aroma" of the Old Draught more interesting than this one or not?
|
Find This Beer (Want/Have)