surfmurf (77), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 |
Dec 28, 2003 Not a bad beer for the price. Had a rich gold appearance and a frothy head and nice lacing but the bastard sized can won't fit in the fridge.
 warrior (213), Mt. Wolf, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Dec 27, 2003 Updated: May 14, 2006Actually had some hop flavor and malt taste. Not as much flavor as I like but one of the most falvorful mass produced beers from BMC. I would drink this before a Bud, Miller or any of the lights. Actually the most flavorful beer from Miller was their special reserve that they made for several years. It was a very good beer but they quit making it.
thedm (3836), Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 4/5 | 6/20 |
Dec 24, 2003 This brew poured from a can formed a medium head of white colored mostly lasting bubbles that left behind a softly carbonated straw yellow colored transparent body and a poor lace. The aroma was a nice mild malt hop one with none of the usual American Standard skunky odors. The mouthfeel is initially bubbly and smooth with a somewhat thick malty finish. THe flavoer is mostly slightly thick malts and very little hops.
BigSkyman007 (194), USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 1, 2003 Probably the best of Coors main beers...nice golden color, a bit more flavor than Coors banquet or Coors Light...Not bad for a macrobrew.
wulfhere (217), Billings, Montana, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Nov 11, 2003 I like Coors Gold better than Banquet. Medium Golden color with a hint of hops. No malt to speak of until you get the first taste. Hops on the front end, although subtle. Thin body, and bubbles that faded too quickly. No real body to this beer, but the flavor is superior to Bud, Miller or Coors Banquet.
heemer77 (4309), Savannah, Missouri, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Nov 10, 2003 I like this more than Coors Original. Has a little more carbonation and some more flavor.
foduck (304), Denton, Texas, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Sep 18, 2003 Better than Coors Original or Coors Light. Tiniest hints of malt, no hop prescense. Drying on the palate. When you have no other options, grab this instead of one of the other Coors. Watery. It's got just the right balance of wateryness to fizziness to be chugged. Relatively inoffensive.
Terminus (1955), Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Sep 16, 2003 Updated: Sep 17, 2003can under the name "extra gold" with no coors label other than where the can was produced-ya know, this wasn't a bad beer for what it was. this beer had alot more tase than the other crap people were drinking at a party i went to this weekend
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)