 gsmitty80 (653), Washington DC, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Dec 1, 2002 Updated: May 3, 2003Wow bad experiance with this beer. Dont recommend unless its next to the day old milk.
Supaflyfresh99 (98), E.Williston, New York, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Nov 30, 2002 This represents an effort by one of the majors to add some flavor to one of their crappy beers. In moderate success.
Sturgess (173), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Nov 28, 2002 I like this extra gold....It’s better than coors light, and it’s pretty cheap.
crazyvin (1254), New York, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Nov 26, 2002 my fav! of the coors family. Its got all the elements of beer color and flavour
beastdog75 (337), Brick, New Jersey, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Nov 14, 2002 One of the better Coors products. Actually has some malt and hop flavor present. Nice dark straw/light gold color.
Dogbrick (2901), Columbus, Ohio, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Nov 14, 2002 Can version. I paid exactly 50 cents to try this. I was all ready to make fun of the name but this beer really does have an nice gold color which surprised me. It smelled and tasted pretty crappy though, and that didn’t surprise me at all.
bluemeow76 (693), Lewis Center, Ohio, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Nov 14, 2002 Oddly a nice color. Especially considering how terrible the taste is. Very watery.
Crash (449), Macomb, Illinois, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
Nov 6, 2002
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)