tkeenan (2), St. Louis, Missouri, USA
does not count  | 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Aug 6, 2008 It’s too bad you can’t incorporate price/value into the ratings. For a mass-produced American beer it takes the cake in terms of everyday drinking on a budget. Easy on the stomach, but not so light as to forget you’re drinking beer. Not too carbonated.
On a side note: in my local market, Bud is creeping up in price near some of the cheaper imports like Becks. I would imagine that once transport is figured in, the margins are very high for Bud. At 15 bucks per 30, I’m glad Coors (a better beer imo) isn’t out to gouge me in these troubled economic times.
 unclemike (833), Ft. Riley, Kansas, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Aug 1, 2008 A very light beer, pretty much tasteless. It is made from good water; I just don’t know what went wrong. There is no aroma, no taste, and the appearance is that of foamy water
maniac4016 (114), bill clinton, Iceland
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Jul 27, 2008 a little more body than coor’s light, drank about 8,000 each of both during the nascar freebie in joliet, the dude driving the motor-coach & did all the cooking was coll as hell, a former dirt track racer he did a outstanding job . cudoos & thank you
rman18 (201), South Amboy, New Jersey, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Jul 26, 2008 Bottle - pours light yellow. No hops not malt.. Its actually not too bad for a Pale lager... Much better then budweiser and MUCH better then Coors Light. No not a favorite but what do you expect from the makes of Coors light?
blutt59 (2169), Dallas, Texas, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Jul 19, 2008 can, pours light golden yellow with a grassy nose, flavors are bubblegum and algae, tinny finish
elihapa (1067), Honolulu, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 17, 2008 This beer is inexcusable. Even its presentation is bad: dull gray-gold cans, who does that?? All this beer is is calories and a skunky metal flavor that is repulsive. Spare yourself and stay away, this beer is a drain pour even at a sloshy Frat party.
Jblauvs (619), Manchester, New Hampshire, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 14, 2008 the Tan Can. Classic beer, with a classic cheap macro taste of metal and pee. coors light with more calories.
VacaBeerDude (19), Vacaville, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 13, 2008 Just about as average and Ho-Humm as you can possibly get. If you have been working hard and you’re dripping in sweat, and this beer is ICE cold, it works well as a quick thirst quencher. I say quick because the last thing you want is to try and drink this beer after it begins to warm. NOT a beautiful thing.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)