konair1 (64), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Sep 5, 2006 One of the worst beers I had ever had, Water tastes better than this. This beer is so tastseless that it should not even be worth drinking when it is for free.
 trokini (1027), San Diego, California, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Sep 5, 2006 As cheap macros go, this is as close as you can get to a decent pale lager. More yellow than most, with an actual white head. Aroma and taste are all grain and corn, with the typical metal. Definitely not good, but not the worst out there.
KennethJ17 (18), East Alton, Illinois, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Aug 27, 2006 I like this beer. A good change from it’s competition. Wouldn’t drink it all the time, but I do go back to it every so often.
jblendy (518), Midland Park, New Jersey, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 18, 2006 Updated: Oct 21, 2006Slightly better than Coors Lt. That’s about it. Crappy aroma, golden piss colored, slightly bitter, crisp dry finish. Easy to drink and it’s real cheap, especially when the only time you drink it is when you get it for free.
jpm30 (1588), East Central, Georgia, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 18, 2006 From the tap, served in a standard bar pint glass.
Poured a clear macro lager golden with a foamy white head that settled into a thin lacing.
Had a nose of grains malts and corn with a light floral aroma.
Good macro carbonation and a softly crisp, smooth light bodied mouthfeel.
Bland, but not awful tasting, passable macro lager drinkability, light graininess with a touch of corn, a light floral hoppiness mixed with a little sweet lemon, very soft in it’s bitterness and a dry mineral finish, a pretty clean finish, no flavors really lingering in the palate.
I hadn’t had a Coors Original in a few years and this was actually better than what I expecting it to be, a passable macro lager when your beer choices are poor. Had this at a suburban St. Louis bar with some work mates while watching the Cardinals smack around the Cubs this afternoon.
zxxzooz (13), Berkeley, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Aug 14, 2006 It’s terrible. The only redeeming qualities to speak of are it’s cheap, you can drink it all day, and because you can drink it all day, it gives you a bit of a buzz.
beerczar69 (39), Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jul 19, 2006 One word lousy.No color and no taste.Giving this beer a 0.5 rating was generous. Would rather drink a glass of water.Coors light is worse than this one and that is saying something.
JohnnyJ (1347), Carlsbad, California, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Jul 19, 2006 Better than bud and about even with MGD. Not a good beer, but easy to drink. Better than the light macro beers out there.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)