iambeer (255), Ontario, Canada Apr 25, 2006 The highest rating is the appearance, its beautiful, mild malt, a hint of honey, way better in the afternoon. I liked it too. dirkules (613), Toronto, Ontario, Canada Oct 15, 2004 The label won’t fool you. This is really quite subpar and a juvenile attempt at a dark lager. What I got as styrofoam and vinegar was supposed to be the alleged honey brown taste. Gross radiomgb (1921), Peterborough, Ontario, Canada Aug 9, 2004 Brown in colour. Small aroma of malt with a slight sweetness. Flavour was very bland, slightly sweet. Not much body. Finishes slight sweet. Very bland and boring. mrkimchee (1414), Toronto, Ontario, Canada Jul 28, 2004 brown, small head. very little aroma, what is there smells sweet and adjuncty. flavour is thin and sweet wih virtually no bitterness. pretty poor. Damage (77), London, Ontario, Canada Nov 7, 2003 Lots of slams here on old Dave Nichol but nevertheless, I like this one. Light malt flavour, subtle sweet honey aftertaste. jerc (3861), Toronto, Ontario, Canada Aug 26, 2003 Not much to this one. bit darker than Sleeman's Honey Brown. Pretty thin on body and flavour. IPFreely (1470), Lewiston, New York, USA Jun 9, 2003 This one was not fun to drink. I thought 'honey brown' was supposed to mean that it had some honey smell and taste and that it was brown. Dave must have missed that meeting. Shenzer (48), Ontario, Canada Mar 6, 2003 Stay away from daves beer. its not good for ya, just look at dave he's got stamach alcers from drinking this crap
|