grant (792), Colorado Springs, CO, Colorado, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Jul 1, 2003 This is bad. I actually thought it might be a decent lager at first, with a buttery, grainy flavor at first taste, but the aftertaste has to be in my all-time top 5 bad. So greasy and metallic, it would be like going around a machine shop and licking all the tools. Almost unfinishable. Jayb0 (752), Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | May 28, 2003 Better lager than many alternatives. Not as sweet or mealy. Doesn't hurt that I associate this beer with having a lot of fun in the New Orleans. Drink cold. SilkTork (4192), Rochester, Kent, England
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | May 23, 2003 Bottle. Smooth and pleasant. Buttery flavour. Some fragrant hops in the finish. A decent lager. Aggie80 (713), Michigan, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 | May 20, 2003 Thin pour, little head. Weak color but a surprisingly smooth drink. A touch of 'bitters' in the flavor, but didn't hurt. This went down very easy and I would think that it would be great with southern cuisine! brfoster (6), Texas, USA does not count | 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 | May 5, 2003 This beer is awesome with crawfish. It is the beat New Orleans beer ever. Very cheep, very good and easy going. omnivore (270), San Francisco, California, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Apr 30, 2003 Very mild beer. Kinda hoppy. But it's just the Budweiser of the South in flavor and color. clvand0 (350), Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Apr 13, 2003 This beer really doesn't have any character or special flavor worth talking about. It's ok for drinking, but there are many others that are better. ElGaucho (1730), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Mar 18, 2003 Pale gold in color with lots of carbonation and a white head. Basic lager flavor; kinda blah. Further support for the theory (my theory) that good beer is hard to find in Southern states.
|