 bigrond (1054), factoryville, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Jun 11, 2005 this was much better than plain old dixie. had this a very good cajun place. Very easy to drink, also a great flavor to complement spicy food.
rudolf (1783), Buffalo, New York, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jun 4, 2005 Nose is of cherry, roasted malt, grassy hops. Deep ruby body, thin off-white head. Roch malt, some maple-esque sweetness. Very light cocoa/coffee and a bittersweet finish. Not bad.
JPDIPSO (4929), Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
May 10, 2005 Chestnut color with a smaller tan head. Wow, I’m getting the same stuff in the nose as omhper. Don’t thing this was in boiling hot container, but it may not be the freshest sample. There do seem to be some undertones of malt, but it is to brutal to continue. Simple sugar sweetness with a touch of dark caramel. Very simple brew. Quite watery in feel. There are some darker malt flavors in the finish. Add some kitchen bouquet to a standard lager, and I think you have this. I’ll rerate when I get a if merited from the next sample.
JohnC (2286), Mission Viejo, California, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
May 6, 2005 clear, dark brown/black, no head. very light body. flavor is a bit carmel-like. not great, not bad
zach8270 (2129), Henrietta, New York, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
May 1, 2005 Updated: Dec 10, 2008[12 oz. bottle] Clear brown color with not much of a head. Burnt malt and brown sugar aroma. Taste is burnt brown sugar and chocolate mixed with a nutty flavor. Very watery and thin. Maybe I just don’t like schwarzbiers, but this wasn’t good.
DocLock (4648), Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Apr 25, 2005 Pours burnt sienna with minimal head. Some roast malt and chocoff in the aroma, along with some cabernet. The taste is as it smells, with some brown sugar, chocolate, and nuts. Weak palate, but not bad in the complexity department.
Styles (1653), Lincoln Park, Michigan, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Apr 23, 2005 Pours dark brown with ruby highlights and a film for head. Very weak aroma. Dark malts with chocolate and coffee for flavor. Very thin body. Just o.k.
FROTHINGSLOSH (2036), GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Apr 22, 2005 Updated: Jun 24, 2006Years ago this was a regular beer for me. I have not had one for about 6 years now and decided to try one again now that my beer palate has expanded. Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a dark brown color with red highlights and only a trace of a tan head. The aroma is faint roasted malt. The flavor is powerful with roasted malt and has moderate chocolate and brown sugar elements. I had forgotten how much I like this one, but it is no longer a favorite.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)