dkoonce (889), People’s Republic of Athens, Ohio, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Nov 8, 2009 Being a huge fan of 90 minute and 60 minute, I was looking forward to this one. I have to admit that this is a little bit of letdown. It’s not a bad beet, in fact, it’s damn good. But, it’s not the logical progression from 60 and 90. A think, sweet beer that doesn’t show the hops you would expect. The alcohol and sweetness dominate the hopping they tout.
iamqueensblvd (227), , Iowa, USA
| 4.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 19/20 | Dec 25, 2009 i had a lot of anticipation leading up to drinking this beer. i had wanted it for well over a year, and finally my cousin brought a bottle to share with a few people. The bottle was aged for just over a year (and still at 21% ABV) and it did not disappoint. Nice cloudy golden pour with a bright white head and a nice hoppy nose. im told the hops are overwhelming up front on a fresh bottle, but this bottle was dominated by a malty sweetness and a great mouthfeel that was slightly thick. one of the greatest beers i have had. puggy211 (596), cordova, Tennessee, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Dec 25, 2009 12 oz bottle. Cellared for about 9 months. Almost clear orange brown with a creamy-frothy beige head. Thick strands of lace. Brown sugar, dough and funky orange. Dusty alcohol underneath. As expected rich and malty with warming sips. Very much to DIPAs what World Wide is to imperial stouts. Starts with cherry and mandarins. Still enough hops around to keep from cloying. Dries lightly with orange peel and slight bitterness. Dangerous candy. JBVatkeens (12), Florida, USA
| 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 | Dec 22, 2009 This is from the bottle. The beer smells very, very hoppy, and the taste is almost offensive in the level of hoppy-ness. This beer walks the thin line between awesome and horrible very well.. on the awesome side I might add.That being said, what a unique beer, I’ve had this a few different times, on tap, and in the bottle. PunkAndRun (5), Florida, USA does not count | 4.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 4/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 19/20 | Dec 22, 2009 A moderate amber color yields a sweet, inviting aroma. Head is virtually absent, flavor is very hoppy and strongly characterized by citrus, almost pine flavors...what I would call the ’bright side’ of hop flavors. The flavor lingers and isn’t at all imposing, rather very light and sweet. A must drink for any fan of IPAs. nhamilton (70), Cibolo, Texas, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Dec 19, 2009 Pours to a golden colored medium body head. Has a sweet/bitter odor if that makes any sense. Did not like the tase and it left a strong aftertaste. I know this is highly rated, but I did not care for it at all. Chalsk (21), North Caldwell, New Jersey, USA
| 4.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 5/5 | 17/20 | Dec 18, 2009 Might as well call it the mind eraser. Every time I drink this, the next thing I remember is waking up in the a.m. Great color, aroma, and fantastic on the palate. I really do enjoy the flavor of this beer, despite its sweetness. I enjoy the bitters more, but this is a great beer. Ceebs25 (242), Naperville, Illinois, USA
| 4.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 3/5 | 9/10 | 3/5 | 18/20 | Dec 17, 2009 12 oz bottle. Hop wine. I could leave it at that and it would probably sum this one up just fine. Kind of like pureed, fermented hops in water (if that were possible). That being said, this gets bonus points just for being made, as it is an intense experience all around. The aroma is of heavy resins, and heavy citrus, though at the same time fairly balanced with cereal grain alcohol, and date and plum dark fruit. Some light, wispy starch white head on the pour, with minor lacing and retention, very thick and murky body, and orange fruit in color. As you would expect, the feel is quite full and chewy, though not overly alcoholic. Actually, its also quite a bit sweeter than expected in the flavor as strong melon fruits take on a big role here. Again though, citrus and resin are all over the place as well. Heavy cereal grains too, making the aroma and flavor play off each other well, though the combination of all that is not quite what I’d expect in the flavor profile (if that makes any sense). Also, as far as unexpected things go, the finish was much less lingering and bitter than I thought it would. Nicely balanced however and kind of leaves you wanting more. Overall, I think this was fantastic. I went back and forth in my opinion as I a drank it, but I’m stopping now by saying that this was a damn good experience as well as a fine beer to celebrate with. Good day (however I will say that my rating might change depending on what kind of mood I’m in, because this is definitely not something I’d go for on a daily basis). ljay6880 (160), , Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 | Dec 17, 2009 12 oz bottle served in a clear tulip. Pour was a deep, dirty gold with a half an inch of fluffy white head. Nose is apricots, bubble gum, hops, pine, and alcohol. Taste is hops, alfalfa, syrup, plastic, apricots with a sweet syrupy finish which made the dry hops shine. This is a very strange and wonderful brew. I had this on tap first, then this bottle a week or two later. This is such a treat on tap and had I been rating that version only, I would have rated it much higher. The tap version doesn’t have nearly the syrupy taste, and is much fruitier. I am not sure how this is possible, but it was a world of difference. Both keg and bottle were from 2009.
|