Birdiebeagle (815), Perkasie, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Feb 17, 2009 Bottle Pours a nice clear amber with a good white head. Laces nicely. Head last for an alright amount of time. Has a nice citrus aroma. Has hints of very light floral to it. Taste is very okay. Totally average. No strong finish. Has a okay mouthfeel and the carbination seems right. Has an american macro feel to it. Not the worst but lacks any depth to make it stand out. topherh (940), Kearney, Missouri, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 10/20 | Feb 12, 2009 12 oz. bottle It’s not that bad it’s not that good, but all in all it’s understood. elihapa (1067), Honolulu, California, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Feb 12, 2009 Updated: May 13, 2009Bottle from Jacon. Flavor is altogether mild, with just a hint of hops. Coming from all those impressive craft pale ales on the market, this one is outdated, tasteless, and poor quality. Retried 5/12/09: bottle. Pours light orange, clear, and with substantial lacing. Aroma of light flowery hops and sugar. Flavor starts with some straw, sugar and flowers, then finishes smooth and fairly sweet. A little watery through the middle. Compared to Dundee’s other offerings in their mix pack, this simple pale ale has nothing too wrong with it. 2.8. cfrancis (352), Gloucester, Ontario, Canada
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Feb 4, 2009 Nice hoppy aroma and taste. Nothing spectacular. Run of the mil Pale Ale. Good average beer. popephred (193), Plainfield, Illinois, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Jan 31, 2009 Poured from the bottle. Pour produced a copper body with a good sized off-white head of foam with decent lacing. The aroma of this ale is perhaps the best of the mixed pack that I bought (six styles, in all) a pleasant hops aroma with some malts, though not much else in the way of character. Flavor is quite bitter, and assaults the taste buds. This ale has stronger hops notes than their IPA (which is perplexing) and ends on a dry, bitter note that sends my tongue searching for a way to scrape itself clean. Bockyhorsey (2554), Mesa, Arizona, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Jan 31, 2009 Bottle. Pale ale is right pale aroma at best for this brew. Copper body with off white head. Watered down and rather generic beer. Should of used this as a pizza or wing beer rather than rating it. osu97gp (178), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jan 23, 2009 Bottle. Pours a medium copper color with about one finger of off-white head. Aroma is of sweet matls. Flavor is metallic with some hops, very thin tasting. Eh. checkmatei1 (630), Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Jan 21, 2009 Bottle: Poured a gold color, with not much head. The aroma was sweet malts and hops. The flavor was some citrus, some hops, and a bitter finish. Overall, a standard ECPA.
|