 bryandhargrave (165), Richmond, Virginia, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
May 23, 2007 Honey is for tea so that people with sore throats wont sound like Gollum. I picked this one up as a single just to have something new in my life and really wished I had left it on the shelf. It did look great in the glass but thats about it.
cking (1041), North Canton, Ohio, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
May 23, 2007 Rated 8/18/06: I don’t know this isn’t terrible but it just doesn’t offer much. I remember drinking this in college, it was better than swill and didn’t cost much more than a sixer of Bud. Anyway aroma is really not present except for a faint scent that lets you know this is beer. Pours a light copper with a decent white head and some proper lacing, not bad. Slightly creamy and full on the palate with a smooth clean finish again not bad. Flavor is of a crisp lager rather bland but there is a nice touch of honey sweetness after the swallow. Mellow and easy to drink, don’t expect anything great.
jefcon (1009), Arlington, Virginia, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
May 14, 2007 When they’re not busy making Gennessee, they’re making this stuff, maybe one of the first non-macros I ever had, long, long ago. Honey-golden with just a bit of head. Virtually without aroma -- a hint of honey and caramel. Taste is heavy on the honey, sweet and cloying on the finish, but nondememo and watery up front. Overall -- not what I remember, but it is what it is.
JAF737300 (797), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
May 11, 2007 POurs alnmost Brown but has a decent head. The aroma has very light notes of honey but the moutfeel does give you more of that zing and it rounds into a smooth flavor.
onehotsexychic (101), Albany, New York, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
May 11, 2007 It’s light, it’s fun, it’s tasty. Def enjoyed can’t remember the look or the smell but it had to be quality if I liked!
uglyblond1 (174), Nebraska, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
May 11, 2007 A little too sweet, and I don’t really like honey in beer. Looks nice. Smooth. For someone that likes this style it would be a good choice, just not quite my style. Hops just OK.
BREWMUSKCLES (1087), New Jersey, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
May 7, 2007 lager is usually a waste and this one does’nt let us down. yeah honey, carbonation and somewhat of a beer flavor- if you like macrocrap with the great taste of honey. the full body is ...i dunno, what!!?
DaMenace123 (251), Houston, Texas, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
May 6, 2007 Drank from the bottle. Flavor is honey sweetness with hints of nuts, a little mediciney like some brown ales I’ve tried.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)