FROTHINGSLOSH (2038), GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Dec 26, 2009 They brought this one back for the second anniversary too. Sampled on draft at the brewery this beer poured a caramel-amber color with a medium sized tan head. The aroma was bitter and had a lightly harsh fruity hop presence and had a soapy undertone. The flvaor was bitter and somewhat harsh fruity hops with a touch of floral hops and a hint of pepper. The finish was long, bitter and fruity. Medium body. Ok. CharlesDarwin (1871), Point Judith, Rhode Island, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Jan 25, 2009 On tap at the brewpub. Noses a heavy styrofoam and screamingly harsh, chemical-heavy Cluster-like hops. This is coarse and biting. I can feel some gentle hop resins underneath, but an infected-like chemical bite makes it unappealing. Pours a coppery red-brown, hazy with a foamy head in off-white. Flavor is rough. There’s a strong, strong chlorine/infection/bad-water bitterness that’s just off-putting. I choked this one down. It was chemical-laden and messy. The malts, strong icky house yeast, and faint decent hop notes were obliterated by either an infection, chlorine in the water, or a lack of treating mineral-heavy water and then loading up on the hops. There’s something wrong here.
|