 booyaatribe (453), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
May 28, 2002 Very spicy, but not much to recommend it other than that. The bottle looks cool.
austinpowers (2828), New York, New York, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
May 6, 2002 Other reviews of this beer say it’s mild and light. I thought FireFox still had some malty punch. Didn’t care for it much, though.
fishman (349), Philadelphia, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Aug 12, 2001 Not much in the way of aroma, but this is a very pleasant drink after having sampled some massively strong stuff. Light mouthfeel, and hints of fruitiness, mellow and smooth. Some might call it boring, but I rather enjoyed it, and will likely try it again on its own.
Delbomber (387), Philadelphia, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 |
Aug 12, 2001 Quite mild. Very little substance, better suited for those just trying new beers that aren’t named Bud or Miller. For the more seasoned beer drinking veteran, this is a boring experience. Dark with a slightly raisin and fruit aroma, with a taste that hints at figs and/or raisins (again, too faint to decipher).
|
Find This Beer (Want/Have)