kp (8396), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Sep 1, 2007 Name: Fire Boat Amber
Date: 07/03/2007
Mode: Bottle
Source: Roadtrip
hazy amber,
light caramel malt aroma with a light astrengent earthy bitterness,
bready malt flavor, kept dry with an earthy hop flavor and bitterness, just a hint of sweetness, well balanced,
Aroma: 3/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 4/10; Palate: 6/10; Overall: 8/20
Rating: 2.1/5.0 Drinkability: 6/10
Score: *+/4
Aurelius (2652), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 | Aug 24, 2007 Very lightly sweet malt aroma, actually a little stale. Light brown amber color, fair label. Tangy, lightly sweet, hopping is a bit off and the flavors are muddy. Some sour fruit - apricot or something. Medium to medium light body. FInishes with tart maltiness. A bit disappointing. Thanks to PorterPounder for this one. bdjames29 (272), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Aug 16, 2007 Bottle. Ehh - I tried to like it because one of my best friends (who is a fireman) shared this with me and was excited - partially because of it’s name but mostly because he really thought it was good.
Not good at all. Weak, flat with virtually no character. PASS. Palidor19 (1780), Brandon, Florida, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Aug 5, 2007 Updated: Aug 14, 2007this is not a good beer. there is hardly any aroma. malts and hops are slightly funky. plus their is an astringent finish. NYHarvey (2154), New York, New York, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Jul 27, 2007 Courtesy of Nick76. The aroma is all smooth sweet malts with faint toasted grain notes. The body is a pretty spot on amber/copper color and holds a diminishing off white head. The fore is toasty grains, but is fairly light and delicate on the tongue. The finish is mildly fruity/toasty. Not bad, but definitely not a standout. boFNjackson (1310), Portland, Oregon, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jun 7, 2007 Bottle... Poureed a reddish, amber color with a thin head that cleared quickly. Tart, malt aroma... pretty bad. Flavors of strong malt with a floral presence and a mild bitterness. I don’t really like this style all that much and this beer doesn’t do anything to change my opinion of it. bhensonb (4336), Woodland, California, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 10/20 | Jun 5, 2007 Light to medium malt aroma with some light floral. Copper color. Frothy beige head that melts rather rapidly. Medium bodied. Mild carbonation. Starts with malt of a medium sort, but there is always a hint of bitter. If there’s fruit, I am losing it in the malt. Floral, on the other hand I think is present. Strong swishing seems to bring a hint of stone fruit, but? Decent, but can you buy better? Is this good value? Only you will know. PorterPounder (3143), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | May 28, 2007 Savannah, Ga. - Kroger Supermarket - 12 oz bottle - medium copper pour, lacking in head. Aroma is faint, some fresh lake water and toffee. Flavor has some home brew diactyl funkiness, a hint of toffee and some nuttiness. Thin mouthfeel. Not one for the ages.
|