BückDich (4857), McCall, Idaho, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Dec 31, 2003 Copper bronze color, creamy head, light lacing. Aroma is fresh with dry hopping (cascade?) and lots of sweetness. Flavor is vaguely bland, light malt and hops, nothing spectacular. Mouthfeel is a tad bittersweet if anything. Eh, pretty well made considering the other Fire Station beers I've had. beerguy101 (3971), Newark, California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Jul 29, 2004 Medium orange gold color. Medium white foamy head. Aroma is malty and fruity. A medium bodied ESB. Malts are fruity and sweet. Hops are slightly bitter and grapefruity. Nicely balanced. Somewhat mild for an ESB, but it does have some hop bite. Touch of orange peel. Lively carbonation. Mouthfeel is full and round. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter. Braudog (3780), Dayton, Ohio, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 | Jul 17, 2005 Bottle in Anchorage AK: Reddish-amber with an average head of bubbles. Little activity. Seducing aroma ... hop bouquet. But the promise isn’t wholly fulfilled. Instead, I get a flat almost flavorless mass-targeted beer. This aims for some hoppiness but it doesn’t live up to the promise. Maybe I’m a bit harsh with it ... this is a good well-balanced concoction, but it just doesn’t stand out. beerinmarch (2829), Washington, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | May 1, 2004 #560 on my beershelf. Nice amber color with a little head. Much better than the other firestation 5 beers ive had. Had some great rich malty flavor with a hint of peach? i think. A little hops in the background to mellow out the malts and a smooth mouthfeel. harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Jan 6, 2006 This is so far from an ESB. This tastes more like an amber ale, the malt character way overpowers anything else, and leaves very little if anything to be bitter, except for a slight bit of hoppiness in the finish. 5000 (2637), Hardened Liver, Washington, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Jan 28, 2004 Bottle pours a coppery orange with very creamy white head. The head seems to cling to the glass well enough. I was suprised to see this brand exibit some finer attributes given the only average qualites of the other ones I sampled. Of course, as I type this the head dissappeard. However, there is still a minut layer of very fine bubbles distributed over the surface with ample carbonation eminating from the bottom. Aroma is faint, light hop nose is present. Initial taste has a little hoppiness, nothing overpowering. Dwindinling bitterness through to the finish. Moderate mouthfeel, perhaps due to the carbonation. A little thin on the exit. Overall I would say this is an alright brew, much better than its four siblings.
BrewDad (2378), Olympia, Washington, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Dec 16, 2006 [12oz Bottle]
Deep amber color with a hoppy aroms and al ight head. This was a surpisingly nice EBS had some flavor but the finish was missing. This is way mass produced and had too many flaws to be a great beer. Metal flavor and a very heavy yeast flavor also. Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Dec 31, 2003 Amber pour with a head of huge bubbles that are leaving pretty quickly. Big hop aroma covers most every other part of the nose up. Small malts, and less hops than in the nose dominate the flavor. A surpisingly bubbly mouthfeel. Very smooth palate and a bitter finish. Definately stands out more in this line of brews than the others.
|