NoiZe (1372), Mooi Zeist, Netherlands
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | May 4, 2008 Dark brown/black colored brew. Malty aroma, not strong. A bit watery. Flavor is malty, chocolate with a light bitterness. Could use stronger bitterness to make it less light. bager (2121), Copenhagen N, Denmark
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | May 3, 2008 Bottled. Dark brown coloured with a small tan head. Malty with notes of chocolate, molasses, dark fruit and hops. Quite mild and thin bodied. GMUcrew7 (365), Mason, Ohio, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | May 2, 2008 Very hard to rate beer. If rated as a porter it is below average. Probably would have a higher rating if it was labeled under a different style, but compared to a quality porter it is lacking. Pours a dark amber color, light for a "porter". Aroma is somewhat malty, with a hint of chocolate. Flavor is better, kind of a toasty, chocolate malt. Really not a bad beer (not great either), just a poor representation of a porter. Very light body, definitely leaves you wanting more. Taverner (870), San Ramon, California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 | May 2, 2008 It’s not a porter - it’s not really a scotch ale. It smells musty - hence the aroma not being high. The bitter taste mixed wtih sweet malt is nice but ends on a sweet note. Not the greatest - bt I’m not a big fan of Flying Dog. Otje (668), Leiden, Netherlands
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | May 1, 2008 Nice beer but not really a porter, a mild ale maybe. Some coffee and chocolate, with a very soft mouthfeel, very drinkable! SirSlarty (68), Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Apr 29, 2008 Is this a new beer? Not a porter and not Flying Dog’s best (speaking as a fan). Very light in color for a porter and doesn’t quite taste right. Tastes more hoppy and slightly fruity than chocolate, malt or coffee. There are certainly better porters out there. A bad aftertaste that I can’t quite describe (another reviewer said ’ashtray’). I suppose that’s where the words "reminiscent of a Porter" come from in the commercial description. talon1117 (628), Bellvue, Colorado, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Apr 28, 2008 Color is very, very dark garnet color witha moderately full, beige, pillowy head which has moderate longevity and leaves some random lacing. Nose is weak and boring; notes of toasted bread crust, light smoke, and faint chocolate, maybe a bit of an abstract, tannic, vinous note. Flavor is better but only by a slight margin; notes are mainly chocolate with light toasty notes, smokey notes, and faint anise. Palate is medium to thin, watery, and soft to lively. Finishes a bit drying with smoke, light bitterness, and some faint hints at the tannic notes. A very curious beer to say the least. More like a dark brown ale with scottish hints (smoke), and an abstract, vinous, tannic note. Could be more interesing if it were better put together. Bullit (1392), Glasgow, Scotland
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Apr 26, 2008 Could not imagine this is actually listed as a porter. Weak sour aroma, with a faint smell of malts. Flavour is fruity, but no roasted malts or chocolate. Disappointing.
|