RateBeer
Gales Conquest Ale Masterbrew 2.88 175

Gales Conquest Ale Masterbrew

 (RETIRED)
Percentile
34
overall
Formerly brewed at Gales
Style: Barley Wine

Horndean, England

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
1752.88/5.02.88/5.09%2.5Snifter
Commercial Description:
Bottle conditioned. Single batch brewed in 2001 for B.United for distribution only in USA.
Ingredients: Maris Otter & Lager malts; and Goldings, Fuggles & Challenger hops.
The fermentation lasted for ten days. Conquest Ale Masterbrew was matured for six months prior to hand bottling.
Was also available in 30 litre kegs.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 marcus (1901), Sacramento, California, USA
1.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/55/102/56/20
Nov 18, 2008  
This hazy copper ale poured with no head and a skunky aroma, The flavor is spoiled applesauce with a bitter finish and an alcohol aftertaste. Not worth drinking.


 PhillyBeer2112 (2089), Orange Park, Florida, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/52/103/54/20
Aug 21, 2008  
Dark orange red, still. Pretty unpleasant IMO. Some rotten fruits, like rancid raisins. Cork was semi-disintegrating and showed signs of leakage, but despite some mild sherry qualities in the finish it wasn’t overtly oxidized, nor was it obviously corked. Finish was mildly tannic and vinous.


 astrofrk (219), Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
1.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/101/55/20
Aug 17, 2008  
(7 yrs)Dark Brown. No head. Aroma: Fruit wine, caramel. Flavor: Fruit wine, vinegar, sour to alcahol finish. OVERATED!


 lithy (1800), Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
2.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/55/103/57/20
Jul 30, 2008    Updated: Aug 18, 2008
2001 vintage. Deep ruby red with no head even with an aggressive pour just a few stray bubbles collect against the glass. Some floaties, but not much. Not looking good. Strong nose of tobacco, some malt sweetness, more alcohol. Strong tobacco in the mouth, thin for a barley wine, thick for a pale ale. Some syrupyness, bland on the front, nothing but earthy tobacco in the back. Pretty offensive. Drain pour. Would consider a second bottle to see if any left in my area are any good, but it seems unlikely. Re-rates: Second bottle was just like the first, got a third from a different store this one with red wrapping at the top not green and doesn’t state Brewed in 2001 on the label, so vintage is unknown even though it says all were brewed in 2001. Dark clear amber pour, weird little floaties that don’t look like yeast, Sherry or Port type liquor aromas, boozy. Still seems to be past its prime but this one is at least drinkable and I think fairly rateable. Sweet but sharp tastes of wood and sweet malt. Still has that earthiness but this isn’t as foul. Booze and a bit of cloying bite in the finish make this still not that enjoyable. First rating is a throwaway but I gave it a 3;3;3;2;5 Total 1.6 New bottle rating 5;3;5;3;7 Total 2.3


 bhensonb (4371), Woodland, California, USA
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/57/105/515/20
Jul 29, 2008  
Bottle from Healthy Spirits in S.F. It’s the old style bottle with a cork, but I can’t find any dates. God knows how old this is. A remnant from the single batch in 2001? Ripe apricot color with an off-white head that went down rapidly. Aromas of rich, light stone fruit (cooked) and light malt. Rather thin in body with very light carbonation. Flavor is leather, stone fruit of the lighter sorts, wood. Finish is dry with fruit notes. Worship. Hop bitter is present, but balances against fruit sweetness. In a strange way, this could be considered a sour ale. I’ll consider it an ale with a tinge of sour. Died and gone to heaven. Wish I’d bought them all (and there were not many). Bottle conditioned rules. Yes, it does.


 Cletus (5058), Connecticut, USA
2.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/53/102/58/20
Jul 8, 2008  
Pours copper with no head to speak of. Smells spicy and cloyingly sweet. Tastes like a mess of sweet malt with a boozy finish. I wish I had started instead of ending with this one.


 Rciesla (3810), Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA
1.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/105/53/102/54/20
Jun 2, 2008  
Bottle. I kinda figured this was past prime and I was right. Hazy brown pour a light sourness, lack of head or retention of C02, possibly UV stricken. Sour aromatic character flavor of wet paper. Drain pour.


 gunhaver (1043), Tampa, Florida, USA
2.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/102/54/102/510/20
Jun 2, 2008    Updated: Jun 5, 2008
2001 bottle. Pours a murky caramel tea color, no head or lacing. Oh boy. Lots of caramel in the nose, slight chocolate, and some hazy wheat and grain. Flavors are medicinal and flat. Caramel...that’s about it that stands out. Watery body. This bottle has gone through some rough times.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC