Arayaga2 (954), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Oct 3, 2009 Clear ruby chestnut with a creamy white head. Aroma is worty caramel. Taste is the same, and pleasant, albeit dilute in intensity. Overall, a truly excellent value among low-cost beers @ $14/case blazin5050 (1), Lumberton, New Jersey, USA does not count | 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 | Oct 2, 2009 I rated a little higher because you can sit here and say that this beer doesn’t taste like a good bock. It’s more like Bock Light, but still to have a slight craft taste and not be offensive at 7 bucks a 12 pack! Come on dude, this beer is a definite go to for the craft beer drinker on a budget, or if just going to a party and feeling like throwing some back without having to go toward Keystone or Natural Ice. I recommend this beer for the craft drinker that wants to play beer pong or keg stand 100% Cheers fata2683 (871), Panama City, Florida, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Aug 30, 2009 can, thanks z13! pours dark mahogany with a thin off white head. Aroma is toasted malt, some carmel and fruity yeast notes. Nutty malt body, wtih great depth and light sweetness ends with a peppery sazz finish. Mildly tart with a alcohol hint edging in toward the end. Not bad at all. TheEpeeist (1449), Swarthmore, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Aug 14, 2009 12 oz can. Clear amber brown with a splotchy coating. Smells like Sugar Daddy’s, maybe a touch of grass. Sharp and fizzy but does have some substance. Taste is brown sugar, sourish lemon pith and wet hay. shawnm213 (934), South Bend, Indiana, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Jul 10, 2009 guest review from homosexual nick selm: what a nice little beer. it has nothing to prove. it’s not trying to impress anyone. it just wants to be lovingly consumed. that’s all. there was no bite at all, but it had a faint hoppy flavor to it. the can, however, tickled my fancy. I don’t think I’ve ever wanted to drink something based on packaging alone since I first saw Vernors Ginger Ale in a glass bottle... Thanks to jeff zathrus13 for this sweet can zdk (220), New York, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 11/20 | Jun 21, 2009 Nice simple (cheap) beer. Supplied by a friend some upstate NY. Malty nose, not much hops but drinkable and refreshing. scrizzz (1269), kirkland, Washington, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Jun 17, 2009 Bottle and Liquid Sunshine VI. Thanks bitbucket! Clear caramel color, small head. Slightly sweet aroma with a touch of caramel. Digging this. Smooth and medium bodied, very nice bock, another good canned beer. bvc (269), Kenmore, Washington, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Jun 8, 2009 Cool looking can. Pours a clear brown with a light off white head. Nose is malty and kind of sweet...not much else going on. Taste, well about the same. Drinkable, but again, I go back to the can...that looks cool.
|