gws57 (1138), Saint Charles, Illinois, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Aug 9, 2005 Had this on draught in Buffalo, New York. Clear and pale orange in color, effervescent, notes of cream soda, excellent washing down a plate of Buffalo Wings, lemme tell ya ... nick76 (2674), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Jul 29, 2005 The aroma is sweet and corn like with very little hopping. The flavor is what you might expect a macro to taste like. The bitterness is medicinal and sweetness is like an artificial sweetener. While the large amount of carbonation gives it some smoothness it is far from creamy. Malty and corn like aftertaste. I would say this is nothing special. stegosaurus (1882), Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jul 11, 2005 pours pale golden with an enormous white head, nothing special in the aroma, smooth tasting with a small amount of bitterness, id say this beer is average, and drinkable, its damn good for when your broke. ehhdayton (1113), USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jul 7, 2005 LIght yellow appearance with a long lasting white head. Not much aroma. Taste is smooth but not much else. carboloader (321), Houston, Texas, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jun 27, 2005 Pours transparent yellow with a huge white head that lasts a while, with some carbonation. Aroma is generic macro brew. A little more flavor but not much. Will not buy again.
3daddict (139), Portland, Maine, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jun 26, 2005 Ok, beer snobs, this is a very inexpensive beer that is way past Bud and should be given some credit. It’s decent, very drinkable, summer beer on the cheap. What’s not to like? Extra coudos for a good beer, that’s inexpensive, without any hype. KAggie97 (2469), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 4/5 | 5/20 | Jun 12, 2005 Pours thin and uninspiring, which is a sign of things to come. A subdued molasses aroma greets the nose while a dubious flavor of the same family awaits the tongue. Mouthfeel is velvety; the only saving grace of this lacluster concoction. UnsofistaCat (222), Garden City, Michigan, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | May 21, 2005 What’s so creamy about it? Maybe the nose…a vary faint vanilla sniff was present. Totally tasteless. I mean, we are talking Budweiser Select tastlessness. I was kind of picturing that this would be the case, but I least thought this beer would have a poundable finish. Nay, nay, awkward going down too. A horrible beer. Who would drink this when one can snag a Stroh’s 30 pack Kid Rock style?
|