 Panzuriel (995), Westerville, Ohio, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Mar 30, 2003 Decent lager without too much sweetness. SOmewhat weak and watery with a fair amount of malt. somewhat lacking in texture.
Murph06 (121), Illinois, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 22, 2003 Okay, but better lagers than this available. Think this is generic taste for most honey browns out there...
WabashMan (817), Noblesville, Indiana, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Feb 10, 2003 Not that I'd care to seek this out again, but the only time I've ever seen it was when a friend had some and gave me a bottle. My life continues on, unchanged.
harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Jan 21, 2003 Take my review of Honey Brown and throw a Killian's label on it. Tastes exactly the same.
kilnari99 (8), Virginia, USA
does not count  | 4.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 19/20 |
Oct 22, 2002 yummy. a taste of honey in my favorite beer. as good as it is i still prefer the red to them all.
morty99 (371), Maryland, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Sep 21, 2002
austinpowers (2828), New York, New York, USA
| 4.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 17/20 |
Jul 25, 2002 Really good stuff. Almost as sweet as Michelob Honey Lager. Complex it’s not, but it’s very drinkable and mild. Sometimes, that exactly what you’re looking for! Much better than their Irish Red and with a yellow label.
|
Find This Beer (Want/Have)