RateBeer
Gluek Stite Light Lager 1.12 55

Gluek Stite Light Lager

Percentile
0
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
550.93/5.01.12/5.03.2%0.3Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
No commercial description
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 BDR (2163), Roseville, Minnesota, USA
1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/101/53/20
Jul 18, 2007  
From a metallic bottle. Pale yellow body with lots of carbonation. Sweet corn nose but nothing offensive. Taste like water with faint grain and a metallic tinge.


 Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/101/54/20
Sep 23, 2005  
Light golden color,no head to speak of.I know i’ve smelled this smell before and i just can’t describe it but it’s industrial in nature.The aroma is maybe malty maybe hoppy and there may even be some fruitiness in there as well to go along with the strange smell that i can’t put my finger on.The industrial side now comes to me in the flavor it’s the grist mill in Lakeville,and the flavor is so light it’s hard to even call this beer.Closer to pond water then anything.Mild malt,some sweetness and just a faint hint of hops in the end and some fruit notes some what citrus i believe.Pure crap i’d rather have the regular stuff over this and that one isn’t even that good.


 stouby (1948), Holbaek, Denmark
0.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/52/101/53/20
Jan 16, 2006  
Bottle, at home. Light golden, no head. No aroma. Flavor light acidic/sour. Light body, watery, flat.


 MilkmanDan (1940), Eagan, Minnesota, USA
0.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/52/101/52/20
Oct 30, 2005  
Stinking horrible. Astoundingly pale, grayish head. Nose a combination of adjuncts, extreme sweetness, and rotting garbage. Flavor is nasty, rotting adjuncts, ridiculously sweet, just plain nasty.


 frankenkitty (1903), Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA
1.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/101/53/102/54/20
Aug 28, 2005  
über-pale lager with a faint, white head (that didn’t last at all). Aroma of a cold, iron safe... taste was similar, yet weaker. A lawnmower beer for a concrete yard.

"With a name like Gluek, it’s got to suck-ass".

<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL<font size=-1>


 JoeM500 (1876), Chicago (little italy), Illinois, USA
0.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/102/52/101/52/20
Aug 24, 2004  
I could not believe that this energy drink sized can of beer could give off such a large bad odor. It was clear in color and matched it’s regular version in spoiled nature. Sulfer abound. Drainpour.


 21iceman40 (1731), vienna, West Virginia, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/53/20
Jun 24, 2005  
a hell of a lot better than the regular stite, but not by much. comes in that ridiculus red bull can again, what the hell is with that. it actually is just a watered down version of the regular, but minus alot of the skunk.


 Enjoyit (1722), Vadum, Denmark
1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/52/101/52/20
Apr 14, 2008  
Clear yelow of color with a very small white head. An aroma of corn, hay, hints of sweets and peanuts. A flavor of ?? Where did the taste go - never found it.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6


About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC