 Soonah (970), Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Apr 18, 2008 Poured a surprisingly clear pale gold color. For all the chest beating they do in their description about how it’s "unfiltered, hazy & cloudy" it really wasn’t all that much so. The aroma was mild citrus, over light barley and wheat. Overall aroma was restrained, but not unpleasant. The flavor was a nice blend of light citrus with some nice wheat and hops that provided a nice finish. Decent mouthfeel. Refreshing and easy to drink. Not bad.
RPillsbury (112), Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Apr 15, 2008 Draught at Cabooses, Geneva, Illinois. I think this may have been the only microbeer available at this train station bar. It was served way too cold and had barely any aroma. However, when faced with Budweiser and Miller Lite, this is miles ahead.
jcwattsrugger (5581), Florida and, New Jersey, USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 |
Apr 13, 2008 12oz bottle-pours a foamy/bubbly white head and hazy yellow color. Aroma is sweet light malty/wheat/creamy/rich, some citrus. Taste is sweet light malty/wheat/creamy/rich, some citrus-orange, some spices. Light side of medium body, some complexness but easy drinking. Good effervescence. Thanks to decaturstevo for sharing.
albertane (376), Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Apr 11, 2008 Draught at Cabooses, Geneva, Illinois. This hazy pale yellow beer was preferable to the macro lagers available at this railway station bar, but it was served far too cold and not as flavourful as better wheat beers.
Jimrbb (16), USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Apr 9, 2008 wheat beer ? with a bit of imagination yes :)
as thirst quencher this beer isn’t that bad. lacks body and complexity. still some work to do
bgrubb7 (6), Illinois, USA
does not count  | 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 |
Apr 7, 2008 While technically a wheat, its very clear, and is almost more lager than wheat. Wonderful cascade flavor. I’ve had it in both bottle, and draft, and the bottle is much better. The hop profile seems to get lost on tap.
IlanMan (850), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Apr 3, 2008 Hazey golden pour with medium head. Aroma is of wheat and maybe some honey. Taste is the same but more dominant wheat with a hint of spice. Smooth brew but nothing special. Not really worth a purchase.
BeerVirgin72 (814), Pataskala, Ohio, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Apr 1, 2008 Had on draft. Poured a very pale hazy gold. Large foamy head. Aroma of watered down citrus. Taste was very light wheat and oranges. I was very disappointed in this beer. Extremly watered down for a GI beer. Blah...
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)