kp (8500), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 | Sep 1, 2007 Name: The Beer to Dine For
Date: 07/17/2006
Mode: Bottle
Source: Roadtrip
clear gold, whispy white head, a unknown species of skunk sprayed into the clear bottle to give it a robust aroma to cover up the sweet malt and floral hops that can be roused upon request, sweet candy flavor with light but tasty (Tettnang) hops, light bitter finish
Aroma: 2/10; Appearance: 4/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 5/20
Rating: 1.5/5.0 Drinkability: 3/10
Score: 4
DJMonarch (6941), Northwich, Cheshire, England
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Jul 24, 2007 750ml Bottle 04/03/2007
Some carbonation. Hoppy aroma. Clear golden coloured hoppy and slightly spicy. Smooth on the palate. A little dryness in a crisp malt finish. nick76 (2684), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jul 13, 2007 Bottle from my trip through South Carolina. The aroma has some hops but mostly pale malt. The appearance is pale gold with a smaller head. The flavor is like the aroma. The palate is thin. Overall it’s rather unremarkable and not much of a beer by itself. Palidor19 (1791), Brandon, Florida, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Jul 13, 2007 Not quite what I was hoping for. its got a mostly malt presence with very little hop aroma and taste. It taste clean yet has very little character. OhioDad (2491), Hilliard, Ohio, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jun 29, 2007 Bottle pours golden with a short white head that stays briefly and leaves a bit of lace. Aromas of slight malts, some grassy hops a bit of skunk. Flavor is grain, a slight bit of citrus and some grass. A fair amount of carbonation gives this a fizzy mouthfeel. Fancy bottle.. Not so fancy of a beer. Kind of crappy actually lagomswedish (213), Umeå, Sweden
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | May 27, 2007 Comes in a bottle that looks like a butt plug, so my expectations weren’t very high. Pours a glowing golden colour, with faint citrus and flower aromas. Despite the name it delivered a disappointing hop bitterness that was short-lived. Rather thin, and I can’t help feeling GK wimped out a bit on the IBUs with this one. If you’re going to call a beer hops, then make damn sure it tastes of hops! BeerVirgin72 (814), Pataskala, Ohio, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Apr 29, 2007 Bottle under name of The Beer To Dine For. I expected a pretty light tasting beer, and thats exactly what I got. Poured a pale yellow with a quicky disapating white frothy head. Taste was very light malts and some citrus. not much else. Rather boring to me. But I have yet to find an English Ale I enjoy, so It might just be a style I dont care for. Perfectly drinkable on a hot day, we had with pork and it went well, just rather boring to me. DruncanVeasey (2753), The Penguin’s Arms, Europe, Warwickshire, England
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Apr 18, 2007 Exceptionally clear yellowish gold with a slick of white suds. Nose-wrinklingly metallic aroma. Smells like lager. Grassy and watery. Very tame and antiseptic-tasting on top of a Ridgeway Blue. Not half as hoppy. Would be completely demolished by food that was remotely spicy, despite the blurb. And yet a gently citrussy bitterness, boozy graininess and bready aftertaste that reminds me of a sweetish strong Belgian ale. Maybe Duvel or Maredsous. Or Piraat. OK, but nothing like as pungently hoppy as hoped for.
|