bdjames29 (272), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | Oct 24, 2006 Bottle. Pee-pee. I completly wasted my money on this. I am going to bitch the store owner out for having this on the shelf. I poured it, tried it and promptly poured it down the drain. Perfectly unappealing. pfhyde (38), Davis, California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Oct 16, 2006 Bottle, brown; 11.2 fluid oz. Pours a shade lighter than burgundy with a thin, dissipating head. Faint, peachy redolence. Although seemingly benign, the rice fermentation lends a subtlety that’s easily overlooked. This beer is definitely more aromatic than flavorful, but I can see how one could take to its smooth, billowy rice aftertaste. While I may not go back for seconds, I’ll definitely keep an eye out for more rice beers. My curiosity is piqued. Bockyhorsey (2554), Mesa, Arizona, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Oct 8, 2006 Bottle. Aroma was like dirty dishwater somewhat stale. Murky red body with head that disipated quickly. A sour lemon flavor. Also had a yeast presence and decent balance. Little heavy down the hatch to be a good football watching beer but decent nonetheless. aracauna (2418), Georgia, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Sep 22, 2006 Pours a clear, good red with a lasting head. The aroma is like sugarfree bubblegum, floral and estery. The flavor is a little thin and sweet, but it’s not bad. Just like the pink orbitz gum. nhorween (640), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 11/20 | Sep 13, 2006 Bottle. Hazy red color with a thin white head (bad retention). Yeasty with some cinnamon in the nose. Flavor is much more mild than I anticipated... slightly sour, very different, with a slight earthy/musty quality. Nice on the palate, bubbly and quite refreshing. I don’t know what to say about this one, other than I won’t have it again. cm001m (1), USA does not count | 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Sep 9, 2006 Bottled. FIrst things to stand out were bubbles, sour, and then a bitter finish. Did catch a taste here or there reminscent of sake. Woody, and with some bite, though no taste of alcohol. By the end of the glass I was liking the beer more than when I began; the sour and bitter had faded substantially. I can’t say I have very refined taste for beers, but the aroma and taste were interesting. That said, I wont be buying it again. Just not worth the price. Love the cute bird-thing though. footbalm (1219), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Sep 8, 2006 Looks like a good brew but really had a very funny taste to it like some funky fruity saki without the taste,burn or buzz. hotstuff (3183), Indiana, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Sep 5, 2006 Bottle. Medium sized fizzy off-white head that mostly diminished, sparse lacing, cloudy, fizzy, lively carbonation, and a dark orange hue. Nose was rice, salty, hops, and a hint of citrus. Flavor was somewhat sweet, citrus and fruity. Mouthfeel was tingly and somewhat of a burning sensation. Light-medium body.
|