Blatz King (150), Whitewater, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Mar 18, 2002 I wasn’t very impressed with this cider. It was OK. I just had a sip or two, but I don’t think that I would buy it. OD40oz (603), Box Elder, South Dakota, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 | Mar 18, 2002 This was pretty decent cider. A little on the expensive side. Doesnt dry your mouth out like the amber hornsby. StevieMSU (64), Kentucky, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Mar 12, 2002 A decent cider but I am not real big on it’s tatse and nor do I like ciders greystreet80 (191), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 | Mar 6, 2002 An excellent cider. A small step down from the Amber, but very flavourfull. Very filling however (like any cider). But ice cold, there is no comparison. Really sweet bottles too! noy-zee (63), Minnesota, USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 | Mar 4, 2002 2nd best cider after woodchuck amber, but still very good. easy to drink, excellent taste. CIVICRACER99 (15), USA
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 | Mar 2, 2002 This is a great cider that quietly messes you up. hankfrank99 (13), USA
| 4.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 4/5 | 9/10 | 3/5 | 17/20 | Mar 1, 2002 some people are convinced that great tasting alcohol is for pansies, but i’m not one of them. pretty good apple cider. slightly stronger than most beers but didn’t cause a hangover. Terminus (1955), Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Feb 25, 2002 If you like hard cider then this is the one for you. Not bad for what it is.
|