 kmeves (1081), Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Nov 4, 2009
Pours a pale/light copper with a frothy white head that quickly dissipates. Aroma is very grainy and slightly floral, not at all citrusy that the Cascades that are advertised would suggest. Flavor is much of the same, leaning more toward the malt and minimal hop flavor. Finishes a bit sweeter than the initial taste. Light to light/medium bodied.
LinusStick (1852), Moon Twp, suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Nov 29, 2009 Blah. A boring APA. Aroma was weak. Light malt and honey. Pour was a decent dark gold with a one finger off white head. Taste was very boring. All honey and roasted caramel with no hoppiness to balance out all the sweet malt. Medium carbonation and a very sticky sweet aftertaste. Nothing great here.
pkbites (340), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| 3.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
Nov 19, 2009 Who says this is light amber or clear amber?? Mine poured a darker yellow with an ever so slightly off white head. Nose of hops and cookie dough. Creamy, malty, and a bit hopped up on the palate. Not as hoppy and bitter as expected, but not too flat. A bit of a watery finish. Like a light version of Dales Pale Ale.
iamqueensblvd (233), , Iowa, USA
| 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Oct 23, 2009 not the greatest APA but i still think it is underrated. mild sweetness mixed in with the hoppy favor. very clean finish on the palate. i do agree however that there is nothing unique about the beer.
undsioux7 (561), Cologne, Minnesota, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Oct 23, 2009 Pours ligght amber with white head that dissapates quickly. Faint aroma and taste of malt and hops. Easy drinking and not bad tasting, there just isn’t anything there
arkurzynski (101), West Bend, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Oct 7, 2009 #50 Pours light amber in color with little carbonation or head. Aroma is high in malt an low in hops. Very low on hop flavor. Barely distinguishable malt character. Not that this one is hard to get down, it just doesn’t fit the bill/bring anything unique or memorable to the table.
MrBunn (1558), Western, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Sep 21, 2009 Bottle. Pours a golden orange with a dense finger or so of foam on top. Aromas are a pointless mix of malty grain and caramel. Not much in terms of hops in the nose... hmm... Flavor is an awful mix of grain (wheat-like), corn and tea like hops. Blech!
phishpond417 (1953), Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 |
Sep 8, 2009 Sampled from bottle: pours a clear amber colour with a small white head. Taste is malty initially with some faint hop notes. Has a bit of sweetness near the finish but overall i find the beer unbalance and weak on hops.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)