RateBeer
Humboldt Winter Nectar 2.96 6

Humboldt Winter Nectar

 (RETIRED)

 Percentile 

Requires
more ratings

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
63.02/5.02.96/5.0Winter6.2%0English pint
Commercial Description:
It has a very malty profile yet finishes dry and crisp.
 kp (8500), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/56/103/513/20
Sep 1, 2007  
Date: 12/19/1998
Mode: Bottle
Source: Chevy Chase, DC

clear dark amber, frothy white head,malt aroma with spicy floral hops, warming malt followed by good hop flavor and lots of bitterness,

Aroma: 6/10; Appearance: 8/10; Flavor: 6/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 13/20
Rating: 3.2/5.0
Score: **+/4
-------- /> The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.


 Eyedrinkale (3209), Astoria, New York, USA
3.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/57/104/513/20
Jan 27, 2004  
Gold color with decent sized head. Big malt taste right up front with caramel finish that you can't ignore. 6.2% masked very nicely.


 21iceman40 (1731), vienna, West Virginia, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/103/513/20
Mar 2, 2003  
A very deep golden/ color with a hint of aged copper. The air is filled with sugary spices and butterscotch. Tastes very weak, with only a small amount of burnt caramel malt coming through, then the taste vanishes. An uninspiring brew here


 DaSilky1 (2029), San Diego, California, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/56/104/512/20
Aug 10, 2002    Updated: Feb 22, 2003
clear and golden with a lathering beauty...
aroma was carmelly and sweet..
Flavor was harsh malty sweetness followed by nothingness..sweet..reminds me of snow..but I HATE SNOW..thats why i moved to san diego..I like these brewers but i dont like this that much..bitters aren't too bitter IMO


 666seth (219), California, USA
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/103/514/20
Jan 15, 2002  
Not bad, altough it starts pretty heavy. This cause of its powerful hoppiness which may is not everyones taste. But not a bad choice for the season.


 joet (1709), Fulton, California, USA
1.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/52/102/53/20
Nov 17, 2001  
Gorgeous deep golden with a bit of amber, and redolent piney hops start this one off. When the foam dies down you can see resinous surface and the approach yields some last second malt carmels. The taste is a total disappointment. These chaps must’ve been talking to Stone. Here’s some advice: lots of hops do not a good beer make. Thanks for the hop tea guys, but this is hardly a beer.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC