RateBeer
Iron Hill Pig Iron Porter 3.52 125

Iron Hill Pig Iron Porter

Percentile
89
overall

bottling
unknown

on tap
common

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
1253.55/5.03.52/5.05.4%87.6English pint, Stem glass
Commercial Description:
The distinct roasted & chocolate notes are well balanced by a slight bitterness.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 JB175 (1664), Bucks County, Pennsylvania, USA
4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/104/516/20
Nov 14, 2006  
Smooth, dark pour with light creamy head. Smooth aroma of chocolate and grains. Taste is nice - smooth dark chocolate, roasted malts. Nice finish. Best to let it warm up a bit. Mmmmmmmmmmm!


 beerBB (132), Harleysville, Pennsylvania, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/55/103/513/20
Nov 3, 2006  
very dark, with tan/cream head. Coffee & caramel aromas. good coffee and roasted malt flavor. somewhat thin but still one of the better IH beers


 MIBRomeo (1965), Wisconsin, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/56/103/511/20
Oct 2, 2006  
dark brown pour tan head light lacing. Coffee roast malts and cocoa powder in the aroma. Avg pal. Flavor is burnt coffee tch of smoke roast malts.. pretty blah and not very good.


 scraff (1955), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
4.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/104/517/20
Sep 28, 2006  
Cask version - Black, thin tan creamy head. Nose had very nice rich tones of caramel cream, soft roasted coffee, cocoa, and black currant. Flavor is similar with lots of cocoa, caramel and light coffee notes shining throughout. Medium bodied, soft smooth carbonation, roasty finish. Best everyday beer from them in my book. A well done porter without a doubt...


jonjon (22), Wilmington, Delaware, USA
3.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/102/514/20
Sep 22, 2006  
On draught at Iron Hill Wilmington. This beer is dark like mud. Cream colored head, minimal retention, not too much lacing. Coffee and chocolate notes on the aroma and flavor. A little bitter for my taste. Mouthfeel was too thin, and you could certainly taste the alcohol.


 bfeldmann (1042), Wilmington, Delaware, USA
2.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/58/103/57/20
Sep 7, 2006  
Good beer not amazing. Poured dark brown with tan head. Basic aroma chocolate and roast. Flavor was much the same. Just an average porter though. Need a little something special in there.


 jason (1624), Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
3.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/58/103/515/20
Sep 5, 2006  
draft. I’m not that big of a porter fan but this one was great. Very nice smell with a roasted presence. Very full bodied and well balanced. Nice as dessert. Good porter.


 xproudfoot (729), Paleolithic, Pennsylvania, USA
3.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/104/515/20
Sep 4, 2006    Updated: Sep 11, 2006
*Damn hidebound authoritarians. OK, well I’m adding this for the regular pig iron porter. Aroma has more raspberry, less fruit cornucopia, and less presence. Lighter on the chocolate, stronger on the coffee than the cask version. Appearance is the same. Flavor is per aroma, almost berry dominated, with a coffee finish. smooth and flavorful. nice. *Served hand pumped and room temp from the cask, real ale, I gave it the following rating: 4.4 (10, 4, 9, 5, 16). Splendid, delightful arom of raisins, grapes, dark chocolate, figs, nuts, a fruit cornucopia. Reddish deep brown beer with faint tan head. Chocolate coffee and all those fruits, plus a hint of cherry and tobacco. Extreme smoothness with a nice lasting roast finish. Completely solid and enjoyable beer, one of the best I had here and really raised my opinion of this place from what I’d been led to believe. I had the regular tap pig iron porter right next to this, and there is no comparing them. The cask is far superior and had all sorts of flavors and palate qualities totally missing in the regular porter. It is without a doubt in my mind a far different nd far superior beer this way. The special people in charge here moved this into the same beer. It is not the same beer and I don’t see how other cask beers get separate ratings if one that tastes this different does not.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC