 Jine (896), Nutley, New Jersey, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Sep 23, 2004 the aroma is a little off but not bad. overall a fair beer, better than the macros as far as session type beers go. I think its alright and would buy it again. New Jersey represent
willblake (2191), Belcamp, Maryland, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Jan 13, 2004 Looks like Bud Lite poured in a wet glass, pale yellow and fizzless. Had a head when poured but vannished promptly. Aroma is sort of corn and tap water, a bit chemical. Has a bit of a BMC bready flavor, could possibly be an alternative to BMC in a sports bar with wings or very greasy fries. No thanks.
Dorwart (1831), Robbinsville, New Jersey, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jan 13, 2004 Hmmm. Something off about the aroma. Cant place it though. Without sounding offensive, but reminds me vaguely of vomit. Anyway, thin head which does not last long. Minimal carbonation. Nice lacing though. Color is medium gold. Sort of a buttery/corn/cracker flavor that is different. Not offensive though. Finish is creamy and goes back to creamed corn. Not a beer that many will like.
surfmurf (77), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/20 |
Dec 26, 2003 Very light almost non existant flavor. Had practically no carbonation and a thin watery head which disappeared quickly. Although not a bad taste, just uninspiring but worth a try.
dberger624 (1028), Phila, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Oct 4, 2003 Bottled. Boring beer. Nothing special here. Tasted like a beer.
raymow (738), Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Sep 6, 2003 Not exactly the best beer I've ever had. It almost tastes like a quality microbrew, but falls a little short. I'd drink it again over Bud or Miller, but it wouldn't be one of my 1st 8 or 9 hundred choices. (Close but no cigar!)
austinpowers (2828), New York, New York, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
May 9, 2003 A fairly decent, yet watery ale that won't offend because there's little complexity here. If you're looking for a mild, gulping ale while in Ocean County, NJ, you've found it. Contract brewed in 2003 by River Horse brewing, which is known for making some extremely mild ales itself.
Jayb0 (752), Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 |
Feb 12, 2003 Here's a trojan horse of a beer. Nice packaging but has a nasty surprise inside. This beer proves that micro-brewery does not equal craft-brewery. As far as I can tell this is an attempt to make cheap beer and sell it at higher prices. To me there is a distinct corn aspect. Starts like an ok lager, loses any up front character and leaves you with a corny, metallic aftertaste. If you're going to buy this you may as well spend less and get your favorite macro.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)