morrdt (608), Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Oct 16, 2007 Single 11.5 oz bottle from Total Wine here in Jacksonville, FL, labeled Sleeman Porter 68*. Pours a murky brown with a slight tan head. Aroma is slighty malty. Taste is roasted malts and rather robust. Interesting. LinusStick (1844), Moon Twp, suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Oct 7, 2007 Not too bad. Aroma of dark malt and a little bit of coffe. Pour was a dark brown with a thin tan ring for a head. Taste was bitter dark malt with a wet aftertaste. There were some hops in the aftertaste...more so than any porter of recent memory. Nice burnt taste but a little weak. cheapdark (2016), Monacatootha, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 | Sep 30, 2007 Beautiful brown bottle, quite interesting and unique. First aroma is a bit stale and off, but in a nice way. Clear rootbeer appearance. No head. Roasted campfire hints on the first taste. A little charcoal bitterness follows on the taste buds. Stans up to the other medium alky porters with relative ease. Mild carbonation. Not bad for a dark beer. there is a mild to medium bitterness that builds on the back of the throat during the session. This results in a finish that has a mild to medium feel of burnt meat from the grill on the back of your throat. Not bad overall. prosqtor (408), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Sep 23, 2007 Not bad at all, and actually pretty good. From the bottle in a shaker, watching the Packers beat SD. Nice dark pour, with a thin tan head. "Bold malty taste" is right -- surprising me with its taste for a non-specialist brewery. Good got better as it warmed a little. daniel0017 (232), Ontario, Canada
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Aug 30, 2007 341mL bottle: Thin tan, bubbly head on a clear, dark flat body. Aroma is definitely not offensive but doesn’t stand out. The flavor is true to its commercial description: Caramel, roasted malts and barley with chocolatey notes offset by hop bitterness. Palate is a little too effervescent for my notion of a fine porter. Overall, this is a good porter. krysztofar (344), belleville, Illinois, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Aug 25, 2007 12oz bottle. light chocolate color with a frothy off-white head. lots of grains in the nose with a distinct european aroma that doesn’t seem appropriate for this style. a little sweetnees comes through as well. starts off with a pretty robust with a touch of cherry fruit. mid palate is chocolaty and the finish is solid overall. the best of these sleeman beers. robforbes (1094), Bremerton, Washington, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Aug 9, 2007 pours a dark brown with just a hint of red, thick mountainy head that is a tanish in color.
smell is of toasted nuts and malt, grain, and malt.
taste is different, bitter, metalic, a little tangy, leaves the mouth dry, in the end some fruit notes and coffee.
not that bad of a beer, not as cocoa as i would have expected, and just a bit watery. robinvboyer (1429), Sturgeon Falls, Ontario, Canada
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Aug 2, 2007 slight roasted malt, smokey aroma. body is VERY thin. Flavour is slightly roasty, and a bit fruity. Not a bad porter, a good beginners porter. Definitely made for the masses.
|