beerlover82 (100), Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Dec 6, 2005 I’m on a budget tonight, so I stopped by my nearest local tavern to pick up a cheap buzz. And I saw a 12-pack of this for $6.25, so I thought might as well. I don’t know what it looks like as this is not the type of beer you pour into a glass. Has the aroma and flavor of cheap adjuncts like corn, rice and aluminum. Is pretty smooth if it’s really ice cold, if not ice cold then it’s downright nasty, like drinking stale water that someone urinated in. As for the supposed 5.9%, I couldn’t tell. No buzz. Typical cheap run-of-the-mill swill. Evster64 (106), Kempner, Texas, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Nov 12, 2005 Updated: Dec 3, 2005Imagine this: you’re sampling the greatest beer you’ve ever tasted. In my case, it was a Samuel Smith’s Imperial Stout. Two days later, someone hands you a Keystone Ice, and out of politeness, you drink it.
To describe the fall-off I experienced going from Imperial Stout to this swill is akin to going from Crown Royal to kerosine. Aroma: sugary, malty, appearance: just like every other pale lager ... Flavor: Corn, sugar, malt, shit. ... Palate: none to speak of, and in the case of this beer, that’s a good thing. ... Overall: Another junk domestic.
America is the beer equivalent to the Los Angeles Clippers. We’ve got a big-sounding name, and a great venue, but we never freekin’ produce. brettpace (179), Northridge, California, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Oct 23, 2005 Ill give it 1/10th of a point for the college memories. Other than that, I will never drink this garbage again. Veeve (312), Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Oct 19, 2005 There’s not much to say. I hate this beer. I have only ever had it once. and believe me....I’ve had a lot of shitty beer. TINOZACCA (146), Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Aug 24, 2005 I will rate this one higher than it’s siblings due to the alcohol content being higher. But it actually tastes worse. Too much alcohol, for a way too watered down beer. Stay away. SuIIy (1465), Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Aug 2, 2005 12oz can. Light yellow color with a foamy white head. Nose is light and corny. taste is water and corn with some rice. very pleasant the following day as most ice beers are. beerguy101 (3946), Newark, California, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jul 15, 2005 12 oz can. Light gold color. Large white foamy head. Aroma is slightly sweet, with lots of grains. A medium to light bodied pale lager. Malts are sweet and grainy. There is the slightest touch of hop bitterness. “Hops, what are hops?” Smooth taste, but not a lot of flavor. Mostly sweet, kind of neutral tasting. Mouthfeel is full. Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is sweet. Nejhleader (930), Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Jul 13, 2005 has no taste, maybe a slight bitterness for an aftertaste, but not a good one. at first i didn’t smell anything but then i picked up this horrible vomit smell, not even exageratting on that. well at least it is drinkable. would have this over stuff like coors and bud.
|