BMan1113VR (2958), Los Angeles (and Dallas), Texas, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 13, 2008 Updated: Aug 18, 2009I was really hoping I could give it at least a point .6 but I really can’t. It is much worse than I remember. I really really tried hard to be as fair and objective as possible, but this stuff really does suck, even at its price point. To the review: Aroma is a complex mixture of dust, cardboard, band-aid and Body Odor (BO). We all know that this looks like piss, with even less foam than piss. Lacing? are you joking? Taste is simple BO, water and corn. The only time I will ever drink this again is when I am absolutely wasted. Marked one point for overall, as this isn’t the worst beer I have ever had. IrishBoy (2726), Bakersfield, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Jan 13, 2008 12 oz can from Odeed; nose of sweet corn; clear gold with a medium white head; flavor of slightly sweet grain, bubbles kind of peppery. angrypirate06 (781), Texas, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jan 13, 2008 As much as I drink this because it is so cheap, I don’t see how this can be considered a beer. It is an insult to beer everywhere. I apologize to anyone who has to drink this. Odeed (1680), Bakersfield, California, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jan 12, 2008 so i needed ONE 12 oz can to make my beer can chicken tomorrow.unfortunately the cheapest thing they had was 12 packs of this stuff.so i figured "rate it?why the hell not!"so here we go....typical pale yellow in color.i picked up some of what might have been citurs type hops in the aroma.flavor is very bitter.and not hop bitter either.tastes like elmars glue.do i need to say more? Wulfstan (509), California, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jan 10, 2008 Updated: Jan 11, 2008I just tried this in another round of sampling cheap 24-ouncers. Expectedly horrid, this has the basic dirty-dishwater quality I had hitherto associated with Bud Light, which makes sense. It’s slightly pale gold with a medium, airy, fizzy white head that immediately vanishes to absolutely nothing. It smells of dirty dishwater with hints of chemicals and moldy grain, but the smell, while faintly off-putting, doesn’t reek like San Mig Light. The taste is extremly watery, bland, and rough with a dry feel but not taste. It has almost no taste at all except that vague dishwater quality and a very faint trace of old rice. The rice quality really comes through here unusually strongly, which says a lot since rice is rather bland. toddbates (95), USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 9, 2008 definitaly a cheep beer suited to beer pong/flip cup prevalent on college campuses nationwide.... badinplaid (103), USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 8, 2008 I guess this qualiies as a beer, I don’t know how...but someone assures me that this isn’t near beer EKGoldings (447), Radford, Virginia, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jan 8, 2008 Definitely a cheap light beer. If I want a light beer and I want it cheap, I’ll head on over to this nondescript fizzy drink.
|