 mikeben (344), Naperville, Illinois, USA
Aug 27, 2007 Not bad but not a whole lot of flavor. Better then Heniken but not as good as say an HB or Hacker Pshore Lager. I wouldn’t go out of my way but I would drink it again.
Crafty07 (391), Florence, Kentucky, USA
Aug 23, 2007 How surprising, a decent beer gets savaged by the effete reviewers of ratebeer. This is a smoother and sweeter than normal pale lager that is far more pleasant than Heineken.
Not a bat pale lager that deserves a better score
ChetLemmons (87), orlando, Florida, USA
Aug 22, 2007 similar to a heineken, only less bitter. mix bud light with a heine and you’ll have this one. prob would not buy again, although it was cheap for an import.
AWS9 (221), Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Aug 18, 2007 Only slightly better than Kronenbourg. Stronger taste, but that doesn’t exactly help it. Boring and poor tasting once the carbonation wears off.
ultraspank (866), Dublin, Ohio, USA
Aug 16, 2007 Nose of grass, spice, and cereal. Pours a sparkling pale straw. The fully lasting wispy white frothy head leaves light lace on my glass. The brew has high acidity, a good tangy bite. Otherwise pretty non-descript. Chugga-lug. The light watery body is very lively with a clean feel to the finish.
Pwn3d (1040), Manhattan, New York, USA
Aug 15, 2007 Updated: Apr 5, 2008I loved the skunky aroma from this beer. The head was awesome and it was easy drinking. This pale lager that is a cut above the rest. I will buy this again.
tarjei (1741), Bryne, Norway
Aug 15, 2007 33 cl bottle. Golden color. Nice white head. Malty, with a bit sweetness. Dry finish. Average.
ph0tik (71), Denver, Colorado, USA
Aug 7, 2007 An average golden lager. Everything about it seems like a slightly worse Heineken to me. Slightly sweet with a somewhat nasty bite at the end.
|
View Statistics
