Kronenbourg 1664

Draught, at L’autre oeil; eye : pale yellow, light effervescence, white head that leaves a ring around the glass; nose : sugary water (maple), 7-UP; mouth : light malt, finale of sugary water and fluorine, thin, light, no carbonation, lightly bitter, quite sweet; overall: I remember now why I have not any since my trip to Europe back in 1989 FRANÇAIS En fût, bue à L’autre œil; oeil : jaune pâle, légère effervescence, petite mousse blanche qui laisse un anneau autour du verre; nez : eau sucrée (d’érable), 7-UP; bouche : léger malt, finale d’eau sucrée et fluor, mince, léger, pas de carbonatation, légèrement amère, très sucrée; en résumé : je me rappelle maintenant pourquoi j’en avais pas bu depuis mon voyage en Europe en 1989

Deep amber with foamy white head. Aroma is fruity, pears. burst of malts and hops. Good combo. Finishes light sweet malt flavor.

it says i need to describe all attributes for this beer ..wow...this beer had nothing..no head, no aroma, no real taste, is a crappy french old milwaukeee...mmmmblaaa!

Poured from the can (as part of a blind lager tast test - probably my worst drinking night ever). Pale gold, fizzy and a frothy white head. Metallic, with just a little bit of sweet malt. (For the record, and not surprisingly, I got only 1/6).

pint can: not as bad as some macro swill, but nothing to brag about. More pleasant than carling, but that’s not saying much. aroma is corny with slight hops. golden color with un appealing white head. Flavor was of macro swill with some bitter notes in the end as well as some metal.

Gold with a thin head. Aroma is corn, malt, rice, bit doughy, and is a bit yeasty. Taste is slightly malty, very light hop content (but atleast you can notice it) with a note of honey.

Golden lager with a middle of the road flavor. It served its purpose and is something would be willing to get again.

Eurolager that’s best when fresh. When you can find it on tap it’s freaking good.