ogivlado (3088), Zagreb, Croatia
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Dec 21, 2002 Canned(500ml). -good refreshing lager, medium dry, little head Donatas (188), Vilnius, Lithuania
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Dec 15, 2002 Refreshing beer. Good, but not great. Not "Royal". Dragonblaze99 (349), Greater London, England
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Feb 25, 2002 About the most tasteless Czech beer I’ve tasted. Unpleasantly bitter. I won’t buy this again. omhper (12298), Stockholm, Sweden
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Jan 26, 2002 Golden. Medium dry, rather bitter, clean.
Quite one-dimensional. One of very few Czechish beers completely without character. motelpogo (4399), Plzen, Czech Republic
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Oct 3, 2001 they say they’re the royal brewers. maybe that’s why the czechs don’t have a royal family Oakes (8139), Kowloon, Hong Kong
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Sep 27, 2001 A good example of how far some Czech breweries have fallen. (If you read old Jackson writings from the 80s he raves about this beer and its hoppiness). eczematic (1206), Sydney, Australia
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Sep 27, 2001 Updated: Mar 7, 2005sweet, bland but drinkable, slightly adjuncty. very low bitterness. zero hop flavour. not gluey or estery though - well made. empty though.
|