Crafty07 (393), Florence, Kentucky, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jun 19, 2009 Skunky corn aroma and thin grassy taste dominate this boring marco.
Not entirely offensive, though, as it seems to be better as you drink it.
But I could be imagining things. curly (742), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 1/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jun 18, 2009 Clear gold, thin white head. Sweet grass aroma, same taste and watery. I only drink this while watching hockey. BDawg82 (33), Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Jun 18, 2009 The aroma is definitely on the sweet side, telling of Blue’s lingering malty finish. Color is the standard pale golden for its category. Flavor is refreshing, a tiny bit hoppy, but mostly just a sweeter malt flavor towards the end. Inoffensive overall, good for guzzlin’. Like an American standard just a bit less bitter (if you can believe that is possible) and a little sweeter. Pretty middle of the road, but a nice change of pace for a comparable price. Mechem (13), Lima, Peru
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Jun 13, 2009 This one was one of my first tries with a Canadian product and I can say I dont prefer it. Airy, and left me unsatisfied. The smell is good but deceiving. I found the taste harsh and bitter. Although I did have it from a can which in my opinion is least desirable, but nevertheless there are much better options. Maltajo (109), TARRYTOWN, New York, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Jun 12, 2009 12oz bottle. It had a nice light golden pour. Very little taste. crisp and refreshing. But there are much better beers out there. Drink it if you must aye. mkel07 (553), Brisbane, Australia
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Jun 11, 2009 330ml bottle. Pale and pasty amber colour with reasonable carbonation and a see through layer of tiny bubbles. Corn and malt aroma with an average tatse and no bitterness at all. Thin mouthfeel. skoll (145), Traverse City, Michigan, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Jun 5, 2009 This beer is what it is and I will rate as such: A great Canadian style lager , a classic Canadian favorite.Light gold colored crisp cold no nonsence commercial Pillsener style with a pleasant taste. Great beer for after mowing the lawn, Not for beer snobs just a bit too average but very drinkable. Cirrhosis (623), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Jun 3, 2009 First time I’ve drank this beer in years, and I got to say it’s not all that bad. The brew looks your standard pale yellow crystal clear lager with a half inch of snow white head that’s gone before you have a chance to you’re your first drink. Very sweet aroma, sweet grainy malts, maybe even a touch of honey, good strength of aroma, not offensive but maybe a touch to sweet. The flavor has this strange mix of banana, honey, with grassy malts and a touch of hops, once again not a bad flavor; it’s not watered down, not offensive, and not stale or skunky. The one thing I did notice as negative was this beer was heavily carbonated causing me to release massive belches every few minuets. This just a beer that’s very easy drinking and great for the poor mans budget, its in my opinion a touch to sweet, but still very drinkable it’s just nothing special, and I’ll have to add I think 80% of all the bad reviews of this beer come from people just slamming it’s because its mass produced, and they don’t even bother doing a proper review."
|