bigcat03 (191), Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Oct 20, 2006 Bottle from my friend Matt poured into shaker - Pours gold with an uneven 1 finger white head quickly diminishes; Wheat, perhaps a hint of something malty to the nose; An attempt at honey on the initial taste but not much else; Sweet fading into bready, backtaste; Lots of carbonation to be seen but not too much when drank; A mildly pleasant brew. Doesn’t live up to the ridiculous hype I’ve heard about it. It’s acceptable, but there are may better american wheats out there. kmweaver (2463), Sebastopol, California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Oct 18, 2006 12oz bottle courtesy of Monger. Thanks, James! Clear golden-yellow appearance; white head with attractive lacing. Aroma is vinuous, almost like a light Sauternes (I feel ridiculous saying this about a 2.5 beer... but it’s true), showing honey and minerals. Light-to-medium mouthfeel, showing wheat and honey (surprise!) and not much else to speak of. A very drinkable wheat beer. GeneralGao (3057), Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Oct 16, 2006 Draught. Clear golden color with bubbly white head that dissipated quickly. Aroma is stale cereal grain. Flavor is similarly uninspiring. I didn’t detect any honey, there was no yeast, and the mouth feel was very watery. Not a well done beer. aarossell (151), Grandville, Michigan, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Oct 3, 2006 not as sweet as I expected. watery. carbonated too much. drinkable. NOT bad. rybowen (105), Los Angeles 90039, California, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Sep 21, 2006 Cardboardy, clear with white minimal head on tap. No wheat, no yeast, no honey in the flavor or aroma. Kind of like a tasty budweiser, if you can imagine that.
Waste of $4.00 Beer2000 (1801), Kristiansand, Norway
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Sep 19, 2006 On tap. Light golden body. Refreshing German style lager, no wheat and no honey (had to confirm with my waitress that I really had been served what I asked for). Quite dry, crispy and bitter aftertaste. OK, but not to interesting. Definitively not my type of beer. bowhunter24 (8), Wisconsin, USA does not count | 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Sep 17, 2006 Botle. The aroma is not reminiscent of a wheat, and the appearence is clear rather than clody as one would expect from something labeled a "wheat" beer. Nevertheless, it is a smooth beer with enough of a flavor to make for a passable beverage. msonnenberg (30), Denver, Colorado, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Sep 14, 2006 Updated: Sep 17, 2006A cheap wheat beer aroma that tapers off with a mild sweetness. The high carbonation is a poor substitute for flavor and palate that are lacking. My sinuses tend to act up after I drink this beer, a good indication that it is adulterated. There is little more to say.
|