dannyb (5), webster groves, Missouri, USA does not count | 4.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 9/10 | 5/5 | 18/20 | Apr 5, 2007 Bottle, Lemp St. Louis Lager Beer - I do not know why people are critizing this one pours good, Nice Aroma has a very satisfying taste- - This is one of my favorite beers- jetzler (622), oklahoma city, Oklahoma, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Mar 23, 2007 Bottle, pours a bit darker than I expected, a slight light copper color, a light lemony hop presence, with a bit of cereal notes. Really not too bad for a pale lager. pet3rman (206), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Mar 12, 2007 Pours golden amber with lots of bubbles and carbonation. Skunky nose. Dissapating offwhite head. Light and thin on the pallate. Sour cardboard taste with some bitterness at the finish. Not very refreshing and not even sessionable. Natural light is more smooth. Absolute Drainpour. Also, I thought Yeungleng was the first American Lager?? theisti (1678), Leawood, Kansas, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Jan 2, 2007 Bottle. Lemp St. Louis Lager Beer on the label, assuming this is the same. Not sure why everyone is criticizing this one. I thought from pour to finish, that this was a solid lager beer. Far superior to the BMC’s of the world, and quite satisfying having a few through the night. vyvvy (2068), Hazelwood, Missouri, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Nov 18, 2006 Well this is simply wretched. Pours dark yellow with a good sized white head. This is a diacetyl bomb, some creamy like pale malt that is lightly sweet, but this is mostly bad butter / butterscotch. Medium / light body with some carbonation. The taste is a bad citric off flavor. The finish is bitter, but not a hop bitterness. This was a drain pour - simply terrible. Avoid. Strykzone (1483), Wood River, Illinois, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Nov 5, 2006 Updated: Apr 12, 2009Nice medium dark in color and is much darker than most pale lagers. Easy drinking and smooth describe it. There is not a lot going on here which is typical of the style. Some decent caramel flavor. jpm30 (1588), East Central, Georgia, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Aug 22, 2006 From a twist cap 12 oz. brown bottle with no freshness date.
Poured a slightly chill hazy dull lager golden with a foamy white head that settled into a thin lacing.
Aromas of grains and dry biscuits, floral and lightly spicy hops, pretty faint and clean overall.
Medium carbonation and a crisp, smooth lightish medium bodied mouthfeel.
Bland, but pleasant tasting, grains and sweet caramel malts, floral hops with a touch of spice, soft in their bitterness, and a dryish caramel malty finish, decent, not great, all-malt lager drinkability.
Not bad, but an average all-malt lager, I’m not sure if it is worth paying the higher price than just buying your basic BMC six, which are usually on sale.
harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Aug 3, 2006 Not much too this beer at all. Light and thin, with absolutely no aroma, exept perhaps a bit of sourness. Tastes like a bit of burnt paper and pencil shavings. Just not good at all.
|