 Cornfield (4977), Oak Forest, Illinois, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Oct 19, 2008 This poured a golden orange body with little of any head. The aroma is peach (Surprize!),maybe a bit too sweet. The flavor cuts back on the honey sweetness and delivers a fairly fresh fruit taste. Peachy finish and pretty refreshing.
Friar Tuck, Bloomington, IL
rustychiles (1068), Mesa, Arizona, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Jun 8, 2008 Pours a hazy reddish golden almost brown see through color with a small white head. Aroma of peach, vinegar, musty funk. Flavor is sweet peaches, vinegar, syrupy sugars, and a little too cloying. Not very good.
obguthr (1069), Poquoson, Virginia, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 1/5 | 8/10 | 1/5 | 15/20 |
Apr 23, 2008 Weak apple, pear, and peach aroma. Hazy golden pour, no head. Full peach flavor and mouthfeel. Delicious and refreshing.
daknole (3030), Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 16, 2008 This is certainly better than the Tropicale made by the same brewery. Good peach aroma and flavor. But there are much better peach Lambics to be found in the wonderful world of beer. A bit too sweet, but a fun beer to drink.
biznizness (956), Mooresville, North Carolina, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Nov 26, 2007 Don’t know why these Boomgaards get no love. They are sweet and delicious. Probably some inconsistency with the style. Who cares. Yum.
Kinz (2220), Glen Allen, Virginia, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Nov 16, 2007 Lightly hazy deep gold, slight but creamy and lasting head. Aroma is quite faint and rather musty. Sweet malts, followed by a big hit of undefined sweetness, and some fruitiness on the finish that is somewhat peach oriented, but doesn’t exactly leap out at you. Perhaps a spiced and preserved peach. Not as offensive as I feared, but I prefer the Lindeman’s Peche if I’m going to go down this road.
bhensonb (4380), Woodland, California, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 29, 2007 375 ml bottle. Sour, lambic type, aroma, but peach is underlying that. Hazy golden amber (or light peach) color with a minimal white head. Leaves some lacing. Thin to medium body with mild carbonation. The flavor is lightly sweet and peach. It is slightly tart, but there is no lambic sour. There is some spice, and it reminds of a pickled, spiced peach. It is very tasty and refreshing. Good for the style.
redlight (1497), Winter Park, Florida, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/20 |
Oct 24, 2007 Tart, metal, hints of peaches, buttery, caramel in the aroma. Pours cloudy orange/gold. Sweet malts, slightly only slightly tart with a little peach flavo r, not very good. The flavor is very "catty."
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)