RateBeer
Long Trail India Pale Ale 3.09 196

Long Trail India Pale Ale

Percentile
55
overall

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
1963.1/5.03.09/5.06.1%17.7Shaker, Tulip
Commercial Description:
British brewers of colonial times utilized the preservative qualities of hops and alcohol to assure that their "pale ale" survived the long trip to colonial India. We believe this to be one of the HOPPIEST brews in the States. ENJOY!
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 HopBackDoc (395), Hatboro, Pennsylvania, USA
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/57/103/516/20
Aug 20, 2006  
12 oz. bottle. Had a slightly hazy amber hue with a small white head. Aroma of citrus/fruit and malt. Flavor was typical for an IPA, with a dry finish. This was good, but seemed to lack something, and I am not sure what it is. Easy drinking IPA, I certainly did not mind finishing the six pack,


 CamdenD (617), Madrid, Spain
2.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/55/102/59/20
Aug 6, 2006  
Almost undrinkable -- not an IPA as much of an amber lager -- hoppy? Not so much, not even balanced. Sticky and unrecommended.


 Immy (1912), Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA
2.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/55/103/510/20
Jun 29, 2006  
On tap at the Connecticut Brew Fest. Hazy orange-gold, small white head. more like a bitter, citrusy pils. Not a great beer.


 illinismitty (1800), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
2.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/55/103/512/20
May 31, 2006  
Bottle. Pours pale amber with dimishing white head. Very strong skunky aroma. Lively mouthfeel. Orange, caramel, and pilsnerque flavors. Tart finish with lingering bitterness. I am wondering if this bottle is old, so I will try to get another. I liked the Double Bag, but this one is not as good.


 JoeMcPhee (5030), Jackson Heights, New York, USA
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/56/103/513/20
May 17, 2006  
12 oz bottle. hazy orange-golden beer, thick fast fading white head. Aroma of orange peel, grapefruit and some sweet appley/berry esters. Flavour is also very fruity throughout. Unusual to have an IPA with such an estery yeast, but it works out pretty well. Flavour is equally fruity with a nice lingering bitterness that just manages to balance the sweet yeastiness.


 hophead75 (1964), Boonton, New Jersey, USA
3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/55/103/512/20
May 2, 2006  
Pours a clear light orange with a medium head, good carbonation. Aroma is of citrus and of malt. Taste is citrusy, slightly bitter, biscuity with some bitterness and thin finish.


 pivo (2537), Germany
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/57/103/513/20
Apr 30, 2006  
Fruity nose and taste: apricots and oranges. Nice pale light gold-orange color. Light bitter, but a full hop flavor. More citrus than hops or bitter. Recalls DFH 120 somehow, but not as good. Drinkable, yes, but not one of the better American IPAs.


 DarkElf (2681), La Jolla, California, USA
2.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/54/103/59/20
Apr 27, 2006  
25-Apr-06 (12 oz bottle: Obtained 21-Mar-06 in trade with Lou18, thanks Lou!) Second shot with this one, 18 months later, and I still don’t like it. It’s just too much like the IPAs that I remember drinking when I lived on the East Coast: bitter, hoppy and unbalanced, due to the flimsy malt backbone. Beers like this are the reason I didn’t like IPAs until I moved to San Diego. The grainy and bitter finish is slightly astringent and just not very enjoyable, especially the aftertaste. The aroma still has that "cheap beer" character, but the hops are fragrant at least. Light-medium bodied, clean and crisp with good carbonation. Very hazy, golden in color, topped by a smallish white head that settles to a wide ring and film, and then leaves patchy lacing on the glass. This style of IPA never has been and never will be my cup of (hop) tea.

26-Nov-04 (12 oz bottle: Obtained in trade with Eyedrinkale, thanks Mike!) Ack! Smells like a cheaply-made lager, floral and sugary sweet. Ack! Tastes like a cheaply-made lager, floral, bitter, grainy, and lightly sweet. The finish is where the bitterness really takes hold, but it tastes bitter rather than hoppy. Or maybe, I just don’t like the flavor this hops produces. Fairly light body with a strong and unpleasant hops bite in the finish. Medium gold in color and completely clear, which allows you to see the plentiful carbonation bubbles rising through the beer. Whitish head pours to an inch thick, retreating to a thin layer, leaving some ringed and draping lacing in the process. I’ll be kind and say this isn’t one of the better IPAs on the market. (4, 3, 4, 2, 9 = 2.2)



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC