 bbooth (115), Gilbert, Arizona, USA
| 4.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 9/10 | 5/5 | 9/10 | 5/5 | 18/20 |
Mar 2, 2002 Great Scottish Ale. Nice smooth hop finish (right to my liking).
Andrew196 (1091), Katy, Texas, USA
| 4.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 5/5 | 9/10 | 5/5 | 17/20 |
Jul 23, 2002 I think this stuff is just as good, if not better, than a Sierra Nevada pale. Perfectly balanced! The hops were tastey, floral....but not TOO floral. Sweet malty finish.....im impressed.
spydog (74), Tempe, USA
| 4.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
Mar 2, 2002 Malty and smooth. Excellent beer.
Falconseye8 (525), Cartersville, Georgia, USA
| 4.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
Oct 5, 2003 This was a very good Pale Ale. Boulevard to this date is still the best I've had. This could be a top 5 though. Depends on the rest of the Pale Ales on my schedule whether they stay up there. I liked this one very much
mikey (337), farmington, Utah, USA
| 4.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 |
Feb 19, 2007 Poured a cloudy, golden orange color with a modest white head with good retention. The nose was fruity sweet hops, a nice touch of apple juice with floral notes and faint pale malts. The taste begins with a nice splash of spicy floral hops, followed by pleasant apples, a medium bitterness and a bit of malt husk. The finish had a pleasant lingering floral bitterness balanced by residual sugars. Very nice and quite interesting. This was a great find.
ttboy8099 (73), Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| 3.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 17/20 |
Feb 7, 2002 Good clean pale ale.
Deimos (78), Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 |
Mar 23, 2002 Fresh clean taste (To coin a phrase) Good aroma with a fruity floral taste that takes getting used to. It’s good, not great.
Murphy (1759), Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
Sep 3, 2002 I was very impressed with this. Incredibly smooth, and easy to drink. Hats off to these guys. Again. Re Rate: Had to knock this one down. Just not as good as the other beers I had rated at 4.0.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)