 tsarman (794), Northern, New Jersey, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Nov 7, 2004 Another one of their standard pale ales. Not a bad beer, but very similar to their others. This seems to be a starting point for their other beers. Decent in many ways, but not something for everyday. It is, however, ubiquitous and a good starter beer for the unadventurous.
Loddeer (171), USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Nov 1, 2004 This one was more adventurous in delivery, with overtones of complex hops providing somewhat of an unbalanced experience. Offers plenty of flavors, but I cannot attest that the harmony of these tastes go well with one another. Seemed almost too ambitious, perhaps it’s the style of English Pale Ales, I am not really accustomed to having these on a regular basis, so I do not have any true basis for comparison. In the end, it’s an okay brew.
GonZoBeeR (2160), ste-Eulalie, Quebec, Canada
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Oct 24, 2004 Arome de houblon et d’agrume.Mousse qui colle au verre.Arome d’agrume et de malt qui ne reste pas beaucoup en bouche.
biznizness (934), Mooresville, North Carolina, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 18, 2004 Is it me or are all the Magic Hat beers the same? They have about 10 different pale ales. Not a bad beer but... I mean it’s pretty much the same as the other stuff. I’d like to see something really unique from Magic Hat... in their regular rotation. Seems like everything that isn’t boring is seasonal.
beerbuzzmontreal (2911), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Oct 17, 2004 Copper color with a thick white head. Strong aroma of malt, with light hops. Powerfull flavor of malt, bitter finish. Light to medium body, oily texture, medium carbonation. It’s a nice pale ale that is more on the malt side and it’s ok with me, vive la différence !
Hawksfan17 (717), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Oct 1, 2004 Smells malty and fresh. Pours clear light brown with almost no head. Tastes malty with nice hop kick at end. Very smooth and nice. Doesn’t really taste that bitter until the end which is nice. It is only a 46 but I like it.
jayme9874 (756), Hamburg, New York, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Sep 7, 2004 Decent pale ale, yeast added some fruity complexities, decent hops and malt. Need to provide better notes,.
Jine (896), Nutley, New Jersey, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Aug 16, 2004 My dad used to get this all the time. So maybe I’m a little biased. Its pretty good as a session beer, though its not as good as some of the other magic hat offerings. Given the choice I’ll take humble patience.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)