RateBeer
Matilda Bay Barking Duck 2.84 17

Matilda Bay Barking Duck


Percentile
31
overall
Brewed by Matilda Bay Brewing Co. (CUB)
Style: Saison

North Fremantle, Australia

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
172.85/5.02.84/5.0Special5.5%3.8Tulip
Commercial Description:
Barking Duck is our interpretation of the little known and very diverse Belgian Farmhouse beers, traditionally made by farmers to feed their workers during summer and harvest; nutritious, safe to drink (the water wasn’t) and refreshing. Made before hops became commonplace in beer so other spices were used as flavouring. It was a time before commercial breweries so each beer was unique to the family farm that produced it. Barking Duck, produced in very limited quantities, combines wheat, oats & barley, two yeasts, three hops and a blend of spices including cassia bark. We thought that since we were playing around with some different spices that we might as well get some spicy characters from an unconventional blend of hops. The hops we’ve used are East Kent Goldings for bitterness; Czech Saaz for flavour & aroma and German Hallertauer for flavour & aroma. The key thing for us is balance so we’ve kept each of the components at a low enough level so that nothing dominates but taken as a whole it’s a pretty complex beer. Although we went non traditional in the recipe, we did stay with tradition on the filtration. We didn’t do any! It’s unfiltered and unpasteurised. As a result, you might notice that the beer is a bit cloudy. That cloudiness comes from the live yeast cells left behind in the beer. Look closely and you might see a bit of funny business going on. There are two kinds of yeast in there. So Barking Duck is complex and refreshing, very fruity in aroma and flavour with mild tartness and a medium bitterness. It has a pale golden amber colour due to the blend of malted wheat and barley.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 OlJuntan64 (1267), Perth, Australia
2.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/55/103/511/20

Apr 16, 2006  
On Tap at the Brass. Served too cold but I the bar staff saw I was rating it and gave me a wine glass - how about that? Pour is a dense cloudy lemony gold with a white medium size medium bubbles head. Wheat grain mash blend and citrus lemon rind and pith aroma improving noticeably as it warmed. Palatewise it chewy and smooth. More tart lemon and grapefruit rind in the flavour medium low grain mash sweetness plus the usually fruity ester, and definitive possibly too much so, gingery spice. Crisp drink-me-again finish. All the right elements are there but somehow it didn’t quite all come together in a balanced way at the end. Anwyay, onya guys for having a go a serious beer.

 gam (1116), brisbane, Australia
2.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/55/102/511/20
Sep 14, 2008  
Good head decent carbonation lemon coloured ale,fruity aroma,lemon peel,wheat.Flavour soapy,tart,bitter not like the aroma,lemon strong,marmalade,some acidity flavour,bitter is off putting.Some will like it.Finish bitter tart.


 Stew41 (1054), Caulfield, Australia
3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/104/56/103/512/20
Apr 5, 2008  
Went in very blind on this one as I didn’t know the beer was styled as a saison at the time. Very wit in apperance; light lemon gold, thin / nothing happening head. Citrus and lemon noise, faint, with some underlying spice. Very very similar to taste. More lemon and spice, and the lemon is very overt for the style. Nice balance on the finish with medium strength spices.


 bridge (659), Sydney, Australia
1.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/103/53/102/56/20
Dec 7, 2007  
Pale yellow with lots of fine carbonation providing a big loose fluffy white head. Sour lemon aroma, reminding me off the 3 Boys Wit. Tastes like shampoo - the trendy stuff with all the flowers and spice and girly stuff. A dry, strange sourness hits the tongue: is cassia related to cinnamon? (Answer: Yes - thank you wikipedia). Feels like it’s expanding in my stomach. the spice is way over the top, and so is the carbonation. Even shared between two this still ended up a drainpour.


capretta (10), Australia
3.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/56/104/513/20
Oct 6, 2007  
light body, thin feel, lively carbonation , not a long lasting head. light straw in colour. the nose is instantly recognisable as a belgium beer. spicy but not peppery. acidic finish with strong wheat malt flavours. not bad,not great, an un complex attempt at the style.


 bozoNZ (505), Christchurch, New Zealand
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/57/103/513/20
Sep 4, 2007  
750ml bottle - Bright pale yellow white, full puffy head. Nose pongs, almost sulphur but dominated by citrus. High carbonation, spices and that biting acidic finish. Good effort at probably a difficult style to achieve.


 Choos (504), Taylors Hill, Australia
2.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/55/103/512/20
Sep 2, 2007  
Aroma: grainy wheat, candied orange with light formaldahyde notes and some sweetness. Apperance: yellow, hazy, head made from large bubbles with patchy lacing. Flavour: initial citrus (lemon) sour notes with a hint of grain. Palate: thin and well carbonated finishes sour grapefruit.


 highlandlad (1275), Sydney, Australia
2.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/54/103/56/20
Jul 19, 2007  
What is it with brewers and ducks? Australia alone has Red Duck, Duckstein and now this saison from Matilda Bay. England has Mallard and Fuzzy Duck. The US has Duck-Rabbit plus both Lost and Dodging Ducks. And there are countless one-off Ducks - Mucky, Flying, Golden, Sick, Drunken, Demented... The list goes on. WTD? Has the brewing world gone quackers? (Certified authentic antique gag circa 1922. I thank you.) None of which has much to do with the matter in hand, which is what to make of this peculiar saison from one of Australia’s most hit-and-miss brewers. When they get it right, Matilda Bay’s stuff can be brilliant, but these occasional specials are as reliable as a Leyland P76. This one was an infuriating mix of the good, the bad and the ugly. The ugly is that awful, drab and uninviting label. Are they trying to warn off potential buyers? The beer itself looked fine - pale straw, hazy with a fat shaving foam head. The aroma had some nice characteristics - sour lemon candies, strong wheaty notes and sweet clove - but was dogged by an eggy, sulphurous taint and some rubber car mat. Soft and medium bodied. The first sip prompted one of those bizarre "sensation moments" when something unexpected flashes into your head - swimming pools. Specifically, the heavily chlorinated pool in my old home town. Go figure. At this stage in its bottle life, this was thin and acidic. Minimal malt presence. Sour wheat and piercing lemon notes in the finish. The spices (cassia bark?) cloyed. The raters below are no idiots, so this was obviously better when it was fresh. It’s not aging well. (750ml bottle courtesy of Bridge. BB 19/1/09)


 sinkas (182), Perth/Fremantle, Australia
2.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/102/55/103/515/20
Jul 15, 2007  
Bottle, BWS, Alfred Cove, WA Lots of interesting spiciness, in the bottle which had aged for a good 6 months, the novel spices used hard to distinguis, but all up a very pleasant summer afternoon type beer.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC