RateBeer
Matt Utica Club 1.9 79

Matt Utica Club


Percentile
3
overall

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
791.82/5.01.9/5.05%27.4Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
No commercial description
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 BrewEd (182), Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
1.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/102/53/102/57/20
Jan 25, 2005  
The aromawas really the high point with hints of malt and a hoppy presence. Taste was definitely downhill from the aroma - a bland, sweet, watered-down, malt liquor flavor. I can’t say this was a really bad beer - it just lacked any real distinction or quality.


Osgood (6), Utica, New York, USA
does not count click to see why this rating of Matt Utica Club does not count
4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/105/58/104/518/20
Nov 24, 2004  
I enjoy this beer quite a bit. My partiality to this beer could be because that i’m a Utican myself or it could be the delectable taste for such a low price.


 mongkut4 (132), Florida, USA
0.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/101/52/101/53/20
Aug 8, 2004  
One of the worst beers I’ve had the misfortune to pour down my throat. I’m not sure what they were trying to create but if it was swill, they succeeded.


Maximus55 (40), California, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/55/103/515/20
Aug 3, 2004  
Oh come on people this stuff aint that bad now hehehehe, You shold at least give it a try and if you don’t like it then you at least tried it. It’s cheap itll get you drunk, have fun.


 shadey (1501), Rochester, New York, USA
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Jun 24, 2004  
pee pee in a can. If you had ever been to Utica, you would understand. It needs to be cheap and it needs to keep you drunk. The taste takes a very distant third.


 VTHopHead (936), Barre, Vermont, USA
1.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/54/101/55/20
May 30, 2004  
Earlier comments mentioned its similarity to a malt liquor and I agree. A valid attempt at a balance with a dry, slightly bitter finish.


Timbowl2 (10), USA
0.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/51/20
Nov 10, 2003  
At first tasta, i had concieved this beer to be a malt liqour. It had a flavour that was much to sweet for my liking, and the aroma followed suit. it did have a very nice appearance, however.


 Vac (2394), San Diego, California, USA
2.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/102/56/104/510/20
Oct 20, 2003  
This beer pours with a golden body topped by a thin white head with some lacing. The aroma is slightly sweet and rather well balanced between malt and hops. A slight tomato aroma is detected. The flavor is slightly sweet and malty with a touch of grassy hops and a touch of tomato like character. Light bodied and smooth yet slightly dry.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC