 Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 |
Jan 18, 2005 Nice amber color,small off white head that had a short hangtime then faded leaving little behind.The aroma was mildly malty with a mild but decent hop presence and a slightly sweet smell coming through as well.The taste was nothing special but decent enough with a decent hop showing some light fruit accents with a sort of very mild sweetnes coming through as well.Not bad but definately nothing special.It’s worth a try atleast once but there are better out there.
grant (792), Long Beach, CA/Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Dec 15, 2004 A hazy almond color. Lightly malty, nutty aroma, slight hints of straw. A little bit of plasticy/vinyl hint. Lots of body for a lager, slightly sweet to begin with ending with some blurry hops. Pleasant enough overall, but indistinct.
Sully (1367), Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 2, 2004 A red beer that is a pale lager? OK, the yeast defines the beer not the malt, so OK. I remember talking to eczematic a while ago about Irish Red Ales where he said he just didn’t get it. Ditto. Only a short hit of red, presumably some crystal malt, but so what? A typical lager beer which floats my boat only just.
Saarlander (1579), Rancho Cucamonga, California, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Nov 18, 2004 The flavor wasn’t terrible, but not great. Its head was gone quickly, and it had alot of floaters in it, large white floaters! Couldn’t tell what it was. I’d drink it again, but I wouldn’t buy it.
beerinmarch (2829), Washington, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Nov 16, 2004 Not very impressed with this one from mendocino. Out of the bottle this pours a light golden/amber with a small white head. Light citrus hopping, with a bit of sweet malt backing. Taste is fruiity up front with a balanced bitter finish. The bitterness trails off in the aftertaste leaving a stale hop flavor behind. This brew was very thin tasting with a metallic taste in the finish.
Hab40oz (242), Grants Pass, Oregon, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Nov 15, 2004 Aroma ia pretty much all malt, pours a golden color with a tinge of reddness, thin creamy head. This lager has good spiciness to start then turns to a decent full body. Not bad for a lager, but still a lager.
AlchemistZ (493), Richmond, Virginia, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Oct 11, 2004 Dark gold in color with hints of orange and a white head. Aroma is reminiscent of a brit bitter in hops and malt (I smell tobacco and leather). Some spice in the nose leads me to believe the noble hop desription on the bottle. Flavor takes on a more decidedly noble hop character though it still shows some brit hop character. A big toasty malt throughout leads to sweetness in the finish that is balanced by a mild bitterness.
motelpogo (4394), Plzen, Czech Republic
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Sep 8, 2004 bottled. pretty poor, even for a red ale. light, corn syrup sweetness, aspirin finish
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)