wildnobility (11), USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Dec 29, 2007 I’m not really sure why this beer is getting such terrible ratings. Yes, it is a light beer- but we all know that, so why criticize it for it? Light flavor that goes down easy. Not very flavorful but doesn’t smell or taste bad either. I prefer this to Bud, Bud Light, Miller, Coors, Corona, etc. For a standard, "light" beer, I think this is one of the best.
beerguy12 (23), Dillsburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 5/5 | 16/20 |
Jan 21, 2008 One of the better low carb beers a little on the weak side on the taste but over all not bad and if your diabetic it should not do much harm to your blood sugar
LtColCatsup (6), New York, New York, USA
does not count  | 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 5/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 13, 2008 A very VERY light beer. It really is a beer for people looking to count their calories. As an athlete I’ve had this many times because i cant spare the 150+ calories of other beers. With that being said, the taste clearly suffers. A beer for people who are probably in season.
boutjp97 (6), USA
does not count | 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Feb 2, 2006 Hey, for what it is it’s not that bad. Lack of robust flavor and a real pale watery look to it. All in all I can chug down a bunch of these and not feel guilty about it the next day. This is probably the best beer to drink when trying to lose weight.
jm1907 (18), P=Town, California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 15/20 |
Jul 2, 2008 Ummmm.... I’m fat. Look at you you’re skinny. For some reason I think this is better than a double porter bock pigskin syrup beer. Yeah, I agree. Not the best beer in the world. But I’d say its the best beer for those trying on an otherwise vodka and steak diet. Don’t let the Flems but it.
 kidmartinek (991), austin, Texas, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 |
Nov 2, 2007 Updated: Feb 19, 2008Pale yellow, pours with 2 inches of head. A little watery from the bottle, but not watery on draught. However, the best sub 100 calorie beer at 2.0 grams carbs by far. No competition in this category. Mild sweet aroma and flavor. Smells like good malt and the hops leftover from when they brewed bud select. A lot of grain flavor for a light beer. Lots of bubbling in the glass,, in other words, lot of carbonation. A good bite. This ultra light has more satisfying flavor than the other big 3. Tastes like beer.
Cavie (1447), Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 4, 2009 Pretty watered down, but it doesn’t taste bad enough for me to stop drinking it.
jmw141 (134), Canton, Illinois, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Nov 30, 2007 A buddy of mine brought this over on a Friday night and I decided to give it a try. It wasn’t half bad and I wouldn’t rule out getting it again. Affordable and it has good taste.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)